SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 358

M. HIDAYATULLAH, V. RAMASWAMI, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. WANCHOO, R. SATYANARAYAN RAJU
Mafatlal Narandas Barot – Appellant
Versus
J. D. Rathod, Divisional Controller, State Transport Mehsana – Respondent


Judgement

SATYANARAYANA RAJU, J. : This appeal, by special leave, is against the judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, dated May 28, 1963, dismissing in limine an application filed by the appellant under Art. 226 of the Constitution.

2. The facts material for the purposes of this appeal may be briefly stated. The appellant was a permanent employee of the State Transport Corporation, Gujarat, hereinafter referred to as the Corporation. At the material time he was employed as a Writer in the Visnagar Depot of the Corporation in Mehasana District. On January15, 1962, the appellant applied to the Divisional Controller, State Transport, Mehasana for leave for 15 days on the ground that he had to attend to his personal work . On January 16, 1962, he was transferred from Visnagar to Ambaji where there was a vacancy in the office of the Depot Manager. On 31-1-1962, a formal order transferring the appellant from Visnagar to Ambaji was passed and he was directed to join duty at Ambaji.

3. On that date, the appellant applied for extension of leave on medical grounds but his request was refused by an order, dated February 15, 1962. He was directed to report for duty at Am




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top