SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 142

J. R. MUDHOLKAR, R. S. BACHAWAT, A. K. SARKAR
Sita Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
H.Singh, K.L.SHARMA, O.P.RANA

Judgement

MUDHOLKAR, J. (On behalf of himself and A. K. Sarkar, CJI.): The Additional Sessions Judge, Kumaon, after convicting the appellant Sita Ram of an offence under Section 302, Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife Sindura Rani, has sentenced him to death. The High Court of Allahabad affirmed his conviction but reduced the sentence to one of imprisonment for life.

2. The fact that Sindura Rani met with a homicidal death is not in dispute. What is, however, contended on behalf of the appellant is that there is no evidence on the basis of which his conviction could be based. Admittedly there are no eye-witnesses to the occurrence. The prosecution, case against him rests on the following material:

(1) motive; (2) opportunity; (3) subsequent conduct; (4) false explanation; and (5) confessional statements

3. There is ample evidence on record to show that the relations between the appellant and his wife were very much strained, that the two were living apart and that this was because the appellant suspected that his wife was a woman of loose character. This evidence consists of the testimony of some near relatives and also of several letters written by the appellant to his wife
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top