SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 112

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.B.Gajendragadkar, CJI., V.Ramaswami, M.Hidayatulla, K.N.Venchu
Ahemadabad Millowers Associastions Versus
Textile Labour Association
Civil Appeals Nos. 167 to 173, 537 and 538 of 1965.
Decided date 1-4-1961
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. C. Setalvad, Senior Advocate, (M/s. R. J. Kolah and I. M. Nanavati, Advocates, and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates, of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., with him), for Appellant (In C. A. No. 167 of 1965); M/s. R. J. Kolah and I. M. Nanavati, Advocates, and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates, of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Appellants (In C. As. Nos. 168 and 170 of 1965); Mr. N. A. Palkhivala, Senior Advocate, (Mr. I. M. Nanavati, Advocate, and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., with him), for Appellants (In C. As. Nos. 169 and 173 of 1965): Mr. I. M. Nanavati Advocate, and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Appellants (In C. As. Nos. 171 and 172 of 1965); M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Appellants (In C. As. Nos. 537 and 538 of 1965); M/s. S. R. Vasavada, N. M. Barot, N. H. Shaikh, R. M. Shukla, A. N. Buch and D. T. Trivedi, for Respondents; Mr. C. K. Daphtary. Attorney General for India, (M/s. K. L. Hathi and B. R. G. K. Achar, Advocates, with him), for Intervener No. 1; Mr. G. B. Pai, Advocate, and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Intervener No. 2; Mr. G. Ramanujam, Secy. I. N. T. U. C., for Intervener No. 4: Mr. B. Narayanaswami, Advocate and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Intervener No. 5; Mr. I. M. Nanavati, Advocate and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Intervener No 6: M/s. H. K. Sowani and K. R. Chaudhuri. Advocates, for Intervener No. 7.

Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J.I. : This is a group of seven appeals which arise from an industrial dispute between the appellants, the Ahmedabad Mill Owners Association, Ahmedabad, and 67 employers on the one hand, and the respondent, the Textile Labour Association, Ahmedabad, on the other. This dispute was referred by the Government of Gujarat to the Industrial Court, Gujarat, under Section 73 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (No. XI of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act ). In making the order of reference, the Government stated that it was satisfied that the industrial dispute in question was not likely to be settled by other means. The dispute itself consisted of three questions. These questions have been thus stated in the reference:-

"(1) Whether under the award of the Industrial Court, Bombay, dated the 2nd March, 1950, in Reference (IC) No. 189 of 1949 (as subsequently modified) read with award of the Industrial Court dated the 27th April, 1948, in Revision Petition No. Misc. 1 of 1947, the Ahmedabad Millowners Association and the employers mentioned in the Annexure are bound to pay dearness allowance to their employees on the Consumer Price Index Numbers for working class for Ahmedabad published by the State Government since February, 1964, by using the index numbers in the series for Ahmedabad compiled by the Labour Bureau, Simla, and the linking factor of 3.17 adopted for linking that series to the State series with the old base:

(2) If not, whether the said Ahmedabad Millowners Association and the employers mentioned in the Annexure should pay dearness allowance to their employees for March, 1964 and subsequent months in terms of the aforesaid awards, by treating the index numbers for working class for Ahmedabad published by the State Government since February, 1964, as the index numbers in the State series compiled on the basis of the family budget survey made in 1926-27:

(3) If not, how the dearness allowance to the aforesaid employees for March, 1964 and onwards should be paid on the index numbers for Ahmedabad published by the State Government since February. 1964"

2. The Industrial Court has answered the first question in favour of the appellants, whereas the two remaining questions have been answered in favour of the respondent. In the result, the appellants have been directed to pay dearness allowance to their employees for the month of March, 1964 and for subsequent months on the consumer price index numbers for working class for Ahmedabad published by the State Government since February, 1964, (by using the index numbers in the series for Ahmedabad complied by the Labour Bureau, Simla, and the linking factor of 3.17 adopted for linking that series to the State series with the old base) at the rate of 2.84 pies per day for rise of each point in the cost of living index number over the pre-war figure 73. The Industrial Court has further directed that as per the award in Miscellaneous Application (IC-G) No. 1 of 1960, 75 per cent of the average dearness allowance of the first six months of 1959, i.e., Rs. 63-15-9 per month of 26 working days, shall be consolidated with the basic wage and the difference between the dearness allowance as worked out as indicated and the said sum of Rs. 63-15-9 shall be continued to be paid as dearness allowance. The other terms and conditions in regard to payment of wages, including the dearness allowance, shall continue as under the existing award. The Industrial Court has made it clear that these directions should be given effect to from 1st of January, 1965 and the difference between what is paid and what has become payable under the present award shall be paid on or before April 30, 1965. It appears that before the Industrial Court an agreement had been reached between the Fine Knitting Co. Ltd. of Ahmedabad and the Textile Labour Association, and the award has, therefore, provided that the directions issued by it shall apply only to the spinning department of the Kni














































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top