V. RAMASWAMI, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, P. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, M. HIDAYATULLAH, K. N. WANCHOO
Durga Prasad etc. – Appellant
Versus
H. R. Gomes, Superintendent (Prevention) Central Excise, Nagpur etc. – Respondent
Judgment
RAMASWAMI, J.: These appeals are brought by a certificate from the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench ) dated 25-2-1964 in Special Civil Applications Nos. 437, 448, 459 (sic) and 490 of 1963 wherein the respective appellants challenged the search and seizures carried out by the respondents at the residential-cum-business premises of the appellants in exercise of the power derived form R. 126 L (2) of the Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1963 (hereinafter called the Gold Control Rules ) and Ss. 105 and 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter called the Customs Act ).
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 678 OF 1965:
2. This appeal arises out of Special Civil Application No. 490 of 1963 which relates to the search and seizure of the premises of Sri Durga Prasad on 19-8-1963 and 20-8-1963. The authorisation was granted by the 1st respondent-Assistant Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Nagpur -to the second respondent -Superintendent of Customs and Central Excise-on 19-8-1963 to search the appellant s premises "Shreeram Bhawan" and to seize and take possession of all gold, gold ornaments etc. which were believed to have been kept in contravention of Gold C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.