SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 260

G. K. MITTER, M. HIDAYATULLAH
Lakhi Prasad Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Nathmal Dokania – Respondent


Advocates:
D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, DANIAL LATIF, R.A.GUPTA

Judgment

MITTER, J.: This is an appeal by an unsuccessful candidate at an election held in February 1967 for the Bihar State Legislative Assembly from the Single Member Rajmahal Constituency No. 139. Originally there were eight candidates: we are concerned only with two of them, namely, the election petitioner and respondent, Nathmal Dokania, the returned candidate as a result of the election. The election petitioner lost before the High Court. The main ground on which he presses this appeal are based on paras 4(c) and 4 (e) of the petition. The relevant issue framed by the learned trial Judge with regard to paragraph 4 (c) is issue No. 5 reading:-

"Did the respondent or his election agent or his workers with his or his election agent s consent resort to corrupt practices in the election as alleged by the petitioner and has the result of the election been materially affected thereby?" In para 4 (c) it is pleaded that the respondent himself and his agents and workers including certain name persons with his consent "committed a corrupt practice of publication of statement of facts throughout the constituency and mainly at Shahebganj, Teen Pahar and Rajmahal during the election campaign











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top