SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 12

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I., J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI, G.K. MITTER AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
Rasbihari Panda etc., Appellants
Versus
State of Orissa (In all the Appeals), Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1472 to 1474 of 1968,
D/- 16-1-1969.
Advocates Appeared
In C. As. Nos. 1472 and 1478 of 1968, Mr. J. B. Dadachanji, Advocate of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Appellant; In C. A. No. 1474 of 1968, Mr. A. S. R. Chari Senior Advocate, (Mr. Govind Das, Advocate and Mr. J. B. Dadachanji, Advocate, of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co. with him), for Appellant; Mr. C. K. Daphtary, Senior Advocate, (M/s. Santosh Chatterjee and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, with him), for Respondent (In all the appeals).

Headnote:

Orissa Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act 28 of 1961 - Orissa Essential Articles Control and Requisitioning (Temporary Powers) Act, 1947 - Section 3 (1) - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 and 19 (1) (g) - Orissa Kendu Leaves (Control and Distribution) Order, 1949 - Tenders - Scheme - Purchases of Kendu leaves - Agreement - Default in payment of dues - These appeals arise out of orders passed in petitions moved before High Court of Orissa challenging scheme adopted by Government of Orissa for sale of Kendu leaves in which State has assumed a monopoly of trading - Kendu tree is a wild growth - Its leaf is used mainly in manufacture of bidis - To regulate trade in Kendu leaves State of Orissa has adopted diverse executive and legislative measures - Held, Validity of schemes adopted by Government of Orissa for sale of Kendu leaves must be adjudged in light of Article 19 (1) (g) and Article 14. Instead of inviting tenders Government offered to certain old contractor option to purchase Kendu leaves for year 1968 on terms mentioned therein - Persons to whom contracts were given are not before us, and we cannot declare contracts which had been entered into by the Government for sale of Kendu leaves for year 1968 unlawful in these proceedings - Accepting tenders, State Government will act in interest of general public and not of any class of traders so that in the next season the State may get the entire benefit of monopoly in trade in Kendu leaves and no disproportionate share thereof may be diverted to any private agency - Order accordingly.

Judgement

SHAH, J.: These appeals arise out of orders passed in petitions moved before the High Court of Orissa challenging the scheme adopted by the Government of Orissa for sale of Kendu leaves in which the State has assumed a monopoly of trading, by the Orissa Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act 28 of 1961.

2. Kendu tree is a wild growth. Its leaf is used mainly in the manufacture of bidis. To regulate the trade in Kendu leaves the State of Orissa has adopted diverse executive and legislative measures. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 (1) of the Orissa Essential Articles Control and Requisitioning (Temporary Powers) Act, 1947 the Government of Orissa issued the Orissa Kendu Leaves (Control and Distribution) Order, 1949, providing for the issue of licences to persons trading in Kendu leaves. The District Magistrates were authorised to fix the minimum rates for purchase of Kendu leaves and the Order provided that the licensees should purchase Kendu leaves from the pluckers or owners of private trees and forests at rates not below the minimum prescribed. A trader in Kendu leaves challenged the validity of the Act and the Order before the High Court of Orissa on the plea that the State Legislature was incompetent to enact the Act and that in any event the Act and the Order infringed the guarantee of fundamental freedom to carry on business under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. A Division Bench of the Orissa High Court upheld the validity of the Act: Jagdish Patel v. Patel Tobacco Co., & G. C.Sankar, AlR 1952 Orissa 260. The Court observed that the main purpose of the Order was to prevent indiscriminate and unrestricted competition in the trade in Kendu leaves and to protect the growers and pluckers from exploitation.

3. The Order of 1949 was replaced by another Order issued in 1960, but without any substantial changes in its principal provisions. Thereafter the State Legislure enacted the Orissa Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act 28 of 1961. By Section 3 of the Act no person other than (a) the Government; (b) an officer of Government authorised in that behalf; (c) an agent in respect of the unit in which the leaves have grown shall purchase or transport Kendu leaves. By Section 4 it was enacted that the Government shall, after consultation with the Advisory Committee, fix the price at which Kendu leaves shall be purchased by any officer or agent from growers of Kendu leaves during any year. By Section 8 the Government was authorised to appoint agents for different units to purchase Kendu leaves. Section 10 provided that:

"Kendu leaves purchased by Government or by their officers or agents under this Act shall be sold or otherwise disposed of in such manner as Government may direct"

Out of the net profits derived by the Government, from the trade in Kendu leaves under the Act by Section 11 an amount not less than one half was to be paid to Samities and Grama Panchayats. Sections 14, 15 and 16 dealt with penalties, attempts and abutment of offences and procedure of Courts. Section 18 conferred upon the Government power to make rules for carrying out the purposes of the Act.

4. Agents were appointed by the Government of Orissa to purchase Kendu leaves. The agents were authorised under the agreements to purchase the Kendu leaves and also to trade in the Kendu leaves purchased.

5. A grower of Kendu leaves moved a petition in this Court contending that the principal provions of the Act infringed his fundamental rights under Article 19 (1) (f) & (g) and Art. 14, He challenge Sections 3 and 4 and Rule 7 (5) as infringing the fundamental right under Article 19 (1) (f) and (g) of the Constitution, and Sections 5, 6 and 9 as contravening the equality clause of the Constitution. This Court held in Akadasi Padhan v. The State of Orissa, 1963 Supp 2 SCR 691, that the Orissa Kendu (Control of Trade) Act, 1961, was a valid piece of legislation, and creation of a State monnpoy in Kendu leaves was protected by Article 19 (6) a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top