SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 165

C. A. VAIDIALINGAM, J. M. SHELAT, S. M. SIKRI, A. N. GROVER, A. N. RAY
Makeshwar Nath Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.JHA, R.B.DATAR, S.N.PRASAD

Judgment

SHELAT, J.: - This appeal, by special leave, is against the judgment of the High Court of Patna dismissing in 1imine the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the order of his dismissal from service passed by the Government of Bihar.

2. The appellant was first appointed as a stenographer, Sub-Inspector of Police in 1940 in the Police Service of the State. After the requisite training in the Police training College at Hazaribagh, he was posted as a Sub-Inspector in 1950 Champaran District" In 1954, he was promoted to officiate as an inspector of Police. In June 1955, he worked in Saharsa District as an Officiating Inspector of Police; ....

3. In July 1955. he received a notice to show cause why disciplinary proceeding should not be taken against him in a matter relating to certain cloth recovered at Katihar Police Station in a Police Case under Sections 379 and 414 of the Penal Code. The appellant submitted his reply denying any misappropriation by him On September 26. 1955, he was served with a charge-sheet alleging misappropriation and connivance by him of misappropriation by two constables named therein. This was followed by an enquiry held by the Deputy Superint




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top