SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 83

I. D. DUA, P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S. M. SIKRI
Vivian Rodrick – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
O.P.RANA, S.P.MITAL, Sukumar Basu

Judgment

SIKRI, CJI.: - In this case special leave was limited to the question of sentence only. The relevant facts for determining this point are as follows. The appellant, Vivian Rodrick was tried by the High Court of Calcutta, in exercise of its original jurisdiction, having been committed to stand his trial by the Presidency Magistrate as early as July 31, 1963. The substance of the charges against the appellant were as follows:

(i) that on January 13, 1963 the appellant was a member of an unlawful assembly guilty of rioting, being armed with deadly weapons and as such punishable under Section 148, I. P. C.;

(ii) that on January 13, 1963 the appellant committed the murder of one Vincent D Rozario and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 302, I. P. C.; and

(iii) that on January 13, 1963 the appellant was in possession of explosive substances for unlawful object and thereby committed an offence under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.

Four other persons, Stanley Rodrick, Ranjit Mandal, Simon Das and Ranjit Biswas were also tried jointly with the appellant and convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149, and also under Section 148, L P. C. The jury retur












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top