SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 296

C. A. VAIDIALINGAM, G. K. MITTER, I. D. DUA, P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S. M. SIKRI
Achutyanand Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J.:- The petitioners in this petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution are Achutyanand Singh and the Kaithawalia Cane Growers Co-operative Society registered under the Bihar & Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1935. Petitioner No. 1 is the Secretary of Petitioner No. 2, the Co-operative Society. The facts necessary for the disposal of this writ petition lie in a very narrow compass and are not disputed. We consider it unnecessary for our present purpose to refer to the earlier events including the correspondence between the Co-operative Department and the petitioners in the background of which the impugned order dated January 22, 1968 was made, because they have no material bearing on the question of the invalidity of the impugned order.

2. Ignoring therefore the earlier history of the controversy between the Cane Growers, Co-operative Societies and the Government Department of Co-operative Societies relating to the amalgamation of the Cane Growers Co-operative Societies into Multipurpose Co-operative Societies, we need only begin with the order dated November 25, 1967 passed by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bettiah directing the petitioner societ





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top