SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 84

S. M. SIKRI, I. D. DUA, P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Khursheed – Respondent


Judgment

SIKRI, CJI.: The respondent Mohammad Khursheed, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Shahabad, under S. 302, I.P.C., and sentenced to death. The learned Sessions Judge made a reference for confirmation of the sentence of death and the respondent filed an appeal before the Patna High Court. The High Court altered the conviction of the respondent under S. 302 to one under Section 304 Part I, I.P.C., and altered the sentence of death to one of rigorous imprisonment for eight years. The State of Bihar having obtained special leave the appeal is now before us for disposal.

2. In order to appreciate the contention of the State it is necessary to state the relevant facts. Them were proceedings under S. 144 and then under S. 145, Cr. P. C., between the respondent and Mohd. Hafiz who died as a result of the blow inflicted by the respondent. About three months before the present occurrence, which occurred on August 3, 1965, at about 1.30 p.m., the proceeding under S. 145, Cr. P. C, was decided in favour of the deceased, Mohd. Hafiz. The respondent then filed a title suit in the Court of Munsif at Buxar and this suit was still pending at the time of the occurrence. Both the Hi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top