SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.A. VAIDIALINGAM AND K.K. MATHEW, JJ.
M/s. Chandrana and Co., (In both the Appeals), Appellant
Versus
The State of Mysore (In C.A. No. 1079 of 1967). Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and others (In C.A. No. 1080 of 1967), Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1079 and 1080 of 1967, D/- 11-11-1971.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. T. Desai, Senior Advocate, (Mr. T. A. Ramachandran, Advocate, with him), for Appellant (In both the Appeals); Mr. A. R. Somanatha Iyer Sr. Advocate, (M/s. M. S. Narasimhan and R. B. Datar, Advocates with him), for Respondent (In C. A. No. 1079) of 1967) and Respondents Nos. 2 to 4 (In C. A. No. 1080 of 1967).
Mysore General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Section 5 (5A), 5 (3), 8 (1) - Excise Act, 1957 - Mysore Sales Tax (Amendment) Ordinance 1957 - Mysore Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Mysore Act, 1964 - Section 5 (5) - Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Section 15 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 286 (3) - Dealer in Textiles - Turnover - Assessed to Sales Tax - Whether turnover of Rs.3,87,200 estimated to be value of stock of mill cloth held by Appellant was exigible to tax - Whether Mysore Legislature was competent in 1964 to impose tax on sales of textiles during assessment period – Held, Court think that imposition of sales tax on textiles at rate specified in Second Schedule to Act before they became declared goods was permissible for Legislature of Mysore - Power of Legislature to retrospectively levy tax has not been controverted - There was no fetter on power of Legislature of Mysore in enacting a measure imposing sales tax on turnover of undeclared goods during assessment period at rate specified in 2nd Schedule to Act - It was because textiles became declared goods that Mysore Legislature lost its power to tax sales of textiles at a rate higher than that specified in Section 15 of Central Sales Tax Act, as it stood at relevant time - Though goods on sales of which tax was imposed remained same in substance, their legal quality became different - As textiles were not declared goods before, there was no inhibition on part of Mysore Legislature in subjecting turnover of sales of textiles before that period to a tax higher than that specified in Section 15 of Central Sales Tax Act - Matter can be looked at from a different angle - As Court have already indicated, by virtue of Section 5 (5) of Act No.9 of 1964, substituted sub-section (5-A) was deemed to have been in Mysore General Sales Tax Act always - Only limit on power of a legislature to create a fiction is that is should not transcend its power by its creation - Limitation on power of Legislature of Mysore in 1964 when it enacted was that on sale of declared goods it could not have imposed sales tax at a rate higher than that specified in Section 15 of Central Sales Tax Act as it stood then - There was no limitation on its power to impose tax on turnover of sales of textiles before when they were not declared goods - Appeals dismissed.
Judgment
MATHEW, J.:- These two appeals, by Special leave, are from the judgment dated November 16, 1966 of the Mysore High Court in S.T.R.P. No.52 of 1965 and Writ Petition No. 2349 of 1965.
2. The appellant was a dealer, among other things, in textiles, with its head office at Mercara and a branch at Bangalore. It was assessed to sales tax on April 29, 1965 under the Mysore General Sales Tax, 1957, on its turnover for the period from October 1, 1957 to March 31, 1958. The question in dispute was whether the turnover of Rs.3,87,200 estimated to be the value of the stock of mill cloth held by the Appellant on December 14, 1957 was exigible to tax. The contention of the Appellant before the assessing authority was that the turnover related to mill cloth on which the additional excise duty was not payable and therefore not paid and so the turnover was exempt from sales tax. The contention was rejected. The Appellant appealed to the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. The appeal was dismissed. Its further appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal also proved unsuccessful.
3. The Appellant took the matter in revision to the Mysore High Court and it also filed a writ petition. Its contention in the writ petition was that sub-section (5A) introduced in Section 5 of the Mysore General Sales Tax Act, 1957 by Act No.9 of 1964 under which the levy was made was ultra vires the powers of Mysore Legislature and therefore void.
4. A Division Bench of the High Court by a common judgment dismissed the petitions.
5. The Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 hereinafter referred to as "the Act", came into force on October 1, 1957. Section 5 of the Act is the principal charging section. Under the Act, as it stood originally promulgated, cloth of various categories specified in items Nos. 1 to 7 in the Second Schedule to the Act was subjected to a single point levy in accordance with the provisions of Section 5 (3) of the Act.
6. Pursuant to a proposal for imposition of additional duties of excise in respect of certain articles including cloth, in lieu of the sales tax leviable by the several States in India, Parliament passed the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, (58 of 1957), which came into force on December 24, 1957. The Mysore Sales Tax (Amendment) Ordinance 1957, (Mysore Ordinance 9 of 1957) came into force on December 14, 1957. The Ordinance was replaced by the Mysore Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1958 (Mysore Act No.9 of 1958) which was given retrospective effect as from December 14, 1957.
7. Sub-section (5A) inserted in Section 5 by the Amending Act No.9 of 1958 read as follows:-
"(5A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (3) and (5), and subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 8, in respect of-
(a)(i) the sales of goods mentioned in Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 42 of the Second Schedule, and
(ii) the purchase of the goods mentioned in Item 3 of the Third Schedule;
on which excise duty or additional excise duty levied by the Central Government with effect from the fourteenth day of December, 1957, has not been paid;
(b) the sale of goods mentioned in Items 33 and 42 of the Second Schedule held in stock by the dealer on the fourteenth day of December, 1957, on which the said excise duty is not payable:
the tax payable under this Act shall be levied at the rates and at the points specified in the said Second or Third Schedule, as the case may be, on the dealer in such goods whatever his total turnover during the year relating to such goods may be".
8-9. The existing Section 8 of the Act was renumbered as sub-section (1) thereof and continued to read as follows:-
"No tax shall be payable under this Act on the sale of goods specified in the Fifth Schedule subject to the conditions, and exceptions, if any, set out therein.
10. The following sub-section (2) was added by Amending Act No.9 of 1958 to Section 8:-
"(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) in respect of the sa
referred : Innamuri Gopalan V. State of A P
distinguished : A HajeeAbdul Shakoor and Co v. State of Madras
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.