SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 604

G. K. MITTER, I. D. DUA, J. M. SHELAT, S. M. SIKRI
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Dey – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J.:- These appeals have been presented to this Court pursuant to certificate of fitness granted by the Calcutta High Court under Article 132 (1) of the Constitution from a common judgment of that Court allowing 17 Writ Petitions presented on behalf of the persons detained under the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 (President s Act 19 of 1970) (hereinafter called the Act). In the High Court the constitutional validity of the Act was challenged on the grounds - (1) that it was not a law made by Parliament as contemplated by Article 22 (7) of the Constitution with the result that the extension of the detention for a period longer than three months was unconstitutional. Sections 10 to 13 of the Act were described as violative of Article 22 (4) and (7) of the Constitution; (2) that the restrictions both in respect of substantive law and in respect of procedure imposed by the Act on detenus right guaranted by Article 19 (1) (d) were unreasonable and, therefore, the Act was unconstitutional; and (3) that the Act was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution inasmuch as it gave arbitrary, unguided and uncanalised power to the State Executive without


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top