SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.A. VAIDIALINGAM, I.D. DUA AND G.K. MITTER, JJ.
M/s. Unichem Laboratories Ltd., Appellant (in all the appeals)
Versus
The Workmen, Respondents (in all the appeals).
Civil Appeals Nos. 1091 to 1093 of 1971, D/- 24-2-1972.
Advocates appeared
Mr. V. M. Tarkunde, Sr. Advocate (Messrs R.A. Jahagirdar and I. N. Shroff, Advocates with him, for Appellant) (in all appeals); Messrs. K. T. Sule Janardan Sharma and Miss Indira Jaisingh, Advocates (for No.1) and Mrs. Urmila Kapoor and Miss Kamlesh Bansal, Advocates (for No.2), for Respondents (in all appeals).
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 9-A and 10(4) - Wages scales - Dearness allowance - Appellant was started as a proprietary concern and was later transformed to a public limited Company and registered as such under Indian Companies Act, 1962 - From its inception, the Company has been dealing in business of manufacturing and selling pharmaceutical products - It has its factory - At the time of Reference, Company was employing about workmen, of whom some were operatives and some were members of clerical and subordinate staff - Wage scales of the workmen had been determined originally in Reference - Whether Tribunal has adopted principles when revising wages scales and dearness allowance in case of the appellant – Held, tribunal itself should have gone into matter and evolved a scheme - No doubt, it would have been desirable if Tribunal had actually evolved a scheme - But Tribunal has stated that necessary material for that purpose has not been made available and as such it has not been possible to devise a scheme calculated to afford protection to incentive earning of a workman at raised base performance index - In fact, court also suggested to counsel that parties may consider the matter and submit a scheme for that purpose - In the result, all contentions of appellant are rejected and Award of the Industrial Tribunal in respect of matters in controversy in appeals are confirmed - All the appeals are dismissed - In Civil Appeal, appellant will pay the costs of respondents - Appellant will have three month time from today for payment of the amounts due under the award - Appeals dismissed.
Judgment
VAIDIALINGAM, J.:- These three appeals by special leave, arise out of the Award dated April 15, 1971 of the Industrial Tribunal, Maharashtra, Bombay, in References (I.T. Nos. 20 and 105 of 1969 and 70 of 1970).
2. The main questions that arise for consideration in these appeals relate to the award of dearness allowance, classification of grades and fixation of wages and a direction given by the Industrial Tribunal regarding the Incentive Bonus Scheme as modified by the Company. There is also a minor point regarding a particular clause in the Gratuity Scheme as framed by the Tribunal in Reference (I.T. No. 20 of 1969). Though there are certain other matters dealt with in the award in Reference (I.T. No. 20 of 1969), they are not the subject of controversy in these appeals.
3. We will now state the circumstances under which the References came to be made to the Tribunal
4. The appellant was started as a proprietary concern in the year 1944 and was later transformed to a public limited Company and registered as such under the Indian Companies Act, 1962. From its inception, the Company has been dealing in the business of manufacturing and selling pharmaceutical products. It has its factory in Jogeshwari in Greater Bombay. At the time of the Reference, the Company was employing about 714 workmen, of whom 558 were operatives and 156 were members of the clerical and subordinate staff. All these employees were covered by the demands comprised in all the References. The wage scales of the workmen had been determined originally in Reference (I.T. No. 23 of 1959). The wage scales of the operatives were as follows:-
"Unskilled A Rs. 50-0.09-2.23-0.12-2.93
Unskilled B 1.25-0.06-1.85-0.09-2.30
Semi-skilled A 2.00-0.12-2.72-0.18-3.80
Semi-skilled B 1.76-0.11-2.64-0.15-3.39
Skilled 2.59-0.13-2.85-0.22-3.95-0.30-4.25"
5. The wage-scales of the clerical and subordinate staff were as follows:-
"Junior Chemist Rs. 120-10-200-12-260
Manufacturing Assistant 140-10-220-15-310
Store-keepers}
Store Assistants} 180-10-260-15-350
Stenographers}
Junior Clerk 60-8-90-10-140-E.B.-15-215
Intermediate clerks 75-8-115-12-175-E.B.-15-250
Senior Clerks 115-10-255.15-315-E.B.-20.395."
6. In addition to the basic wages, referred to above, the employees were getting dearness allowance, which in the case of operatives was equal to 80 per cent of the revised textile scale of dearness allowance and in the case of clerical and subordinate staff 100 per cent, of the revised textile scale of dearness allowance.
7. The nomenclature of the grades of the operatives was changed by a consent award in Reference (I.T. No. 170 of 1961). The grades and wages as per this award were as follows:
"Unskilled Rs. 1.25-0.06-1.85-0.09-2.30
Semi-skilled A 1.52-0.02-2.33-0.12-2.93
Semi-skilled B 1.76-0.11-2.64-0.15-3.39
Skilled 2.00-0.12-2.72-0.18-3.39
Highly skilled 2.59-0.13-2.85-0.22-3.95-0.30-4.25"
8. The dearness allowance of the operatives and clerical and subordinate staff underwent a change by the award in Reference (I.T. No. 402 of 1963). Under that award the dearness allowance of the operatives was increased to 90 per cent of the revised textile scale of dearness allowance from January 1, 1964 and 95 per cent of the revised textile scale of dearness allowance from July 1, 1964. The dearness allowance of the clerical and subordinate staff was supplemented at different slabs with effect from January 1, 1964, as follows:-
"Basic salary upto Rs. 100 Operatives dearness allowance plus Rs. 7.50
Basic salary of Rs. 101 to 200 Operatives dearness allowance plus Rs. 15
Basic salary of Rs. 201 to Rs. 300 Operatives dearness allowance plus Rs. 22.50
Basic salary of over Rs. 300 Operatives dearness allowance plus Rs. 25"
9. Though the award prescribed to the clerical and subordinate staff the same rate of dearness allowance of the operatives plus a fixed amount, as referred to above, the Company continued to give them dearness allowance equal to 100 per cent of the revised textile scal
Remington Rand and India v. Its Workmen
Workmen of BalmerLawrie and Co. v. Balmer Lawrie and Co.
relied on : Express Newspapers (private) Ltd. v. Union of India
Greaves Cotton and Co. v. Their Workmen
Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Its Workmen
Greaves Cotton Mill Co. v. Their Workmen
Ahmedabad Millowners Association, etc. v. The Taxtile Labour Assciation
Workmen of Balmer Lawrie and Co. v. Balmer Lawrie and Co.
explained and applied : Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. v. The Workmen
applied : Greaves Cotton and Co.v. Their Workmen
Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Lid. v. Its Workmen
Kamani Metals and Alloys Ltd. v. Their Workmen
The Indian Link Chain Manufacturers Ltd. v. Their Workmen
relied on : Ahmedabad Millowners" Association Ltd. v. The Textile Labour Association
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.