SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 548

A. N. RAY, D. G. PALEKAR, M. H. BEG, S. M. SIKRI, S. N. DWIVEDI
Neptune Assurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

RAY, J. :- (For himself and on behalf of SIKRI, C.J.I.) :- This writ petition challenges the application of the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance 1971, the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act 1971 as well as the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Amendment Act 1972 to the petitioner company. The petitioners are three in numbers, viz., the company and two Directors and shareholders.

2. The petitioners asked for a declaration that the order dated 13 May 1971 made in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 (1) of the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance 1971 and the directions dated 13 May 1971 given by virtue of powers conferred by Section 4 (3) of the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions )Ordinance 1971 are illegal.

3. The paid up capital of the Neptune Assurance Company referred to as the company is Rs. 10,00,000. The petitioner Jalan is a Director of the company. He holds 16,725 ordinary shares of the face value of Rs. 20 each. The petitioner Goenka is a Director of the company. He holds 2,000 ordinary shares of the face value of Rs. 20 each.

4. The company carried on business as general insurers consisting of fire and miscel























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top