SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 254

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. RAY, C.J.I., M.H. BEG AND JASWANT SINGH, JJ.
Hasmukhalal Dahyabhai and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Gujarat and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 374-375 and 457-462 of 1976
Decided on 4-8-1976.
Advocates appeared
M/s. A. K. Sen, S. J. Sorabjee, Sr. Advocates, (M/s. M. V. Chinubhai & B. R. Agarwala, Advocates with them) (in Civil Appeals Nos. 374-375 of 1976), Mr. S. J. Sorabjee, Sr. Advocate, (Mrs. Chinubai, Mr. S. H. Sanjanwala, Mr. P. H. Parekh and Miss Manju Jetley, Advocates with him) (in Civil Appeals Nos. 457-462 of 1976), for Appellants; Mr. J. M. Thakore, Advocate General, Gujarat, (Mr. J. P. Nanavati and Mr. M. N. Shroff, Advocates with him), for Respondent No. 1 In all the Appeals.
* S. C. A. Nos. 1784 of 1973 and 650 1125, 1118, 1123, 1124, 1835 and 1836 of 1974, D/- 12-3-1976 - (Guj.).

Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, B.R.AGRAWAL, H.N.SHROFF, J.M.THAKAR, J.R.Nanavati, M.U.CHINUBHAI, Manju Jetley, P.H.Parekh, S.H.SANJANWALA, SOLI J.SORABJEE, SOLI J.SORABJI

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 31A and 31B - Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling Act XXVII of 1961 - Section 6 - Distribution of Agricultural Land - Acquisition of surplus agricultural land - Land for Allotment - State of Gujarat in respect of restrictions upon holding agricultural land in excess of certain limits and it is also expedient for so securing the distribution of agricultural land as best to sub serve the common good to provide for the acquisition of surplus agricultural land for the allotment thereof to persons who are in need of lands for agriculture (including co-operative farming societies, landless persons, agricultural laborers’ and small holders) or for the allotment of such surplus agricultural lands integrity of which is maintained in compact blocks to a department of Government or to co-operative farming societies or corporations owned or controlled by State, for ensuring the full and efficient use thereof and to provide for other consequential and incidental matters – Held, It is clear to us that proviso to Article 31A (1) of the Constitution confers certain rights upon individuals and protects them from constitutionally illegal invasion. We are, therefore, unable to accept the argument advanced on behalf of the appellants that the "protective umbrella" of Article 31B does not shield the impugned provisions against an attack based upon the limits imposed by second proviso to Article 31A (1) on legislative power - Argument overlooks certain obvious answers: firstly, that limits on legislative powers, imposed by Part III of the Constitution, do have the direct result of protecting individual rights; and, secondly, that no part of the second proviso to Article 31A (1) of Constitution was, as already pointed out above, infringed by impugned provisions, and, thirdly, even if one were to assume, for the sake of argument, that rights conferred on individuals by the 2nd proviso to Article 31A (1), were infringed in any way, provisions of Article 31B of Constitution are enough to repel an attack based upon such an alleged infringement. Both Articles 31A (1) and 31B are intended to operate as protections against consequences of what could otherwise be breaches of the Constitution - Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT

BEG, J.:—The eight Civil Appeals before us by certificates of fitness of the cases for appeals to this Court raise common questions involving the interpretation of Articles 31A and 31B of the Constitution of India in relation to the Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling Act XXVII of 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The preamble of the Act says that it was enacted because:

"xxx it is expedient in the public interest to make a uniform provision for the whole of the State of Gujarat in respect of restrictions upon holding agricultural land in excess of certain limits and it is also expedientfor so securing the distribution of agricultural land as best to subserve the common good to provide for the acquisition of surplus agricultural land for the allotment thereof to persons who are in need of lands for agriculture (including co-operative farming societies, landless persons, agricultural labourers and small holders) or for the allotment of such surplus agricultural lands the integrity of which is maintained in compact blocks to a department of Government or to co-operative farming societies or corporations owned or controlled by the State, for ensuring the full and efficient use thereof and to provide for other consequential and incidental matters hereinafter appearing;"

3. The part of Section 6 of the Act with which we are especially concerned provides:

"6 (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force or in any agreement, usage or decree or order of a Court, with effect from the appointed day, no person shall, subject to the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3), (3A) and (3B) be entitled to hold, whether as owner or tenant or partly as owner and partly as tenant land in excess of the ceiling area.

(2) Where an individual, who holds land, is a member of a family, not being a joint family whichconsists of the individual and his spouse (or more than one spouse) and their minor sons and minor unmarried daughters, irrespective of whether the family also includes any major son, and land is also separately held by such individuals spouse or minor children, then the land held by the individual and the said members of the individuals family, excluding major sons, if any, shall be grouped together for the purposes of this Act and the provisions of this Act shall apply to the total land so grouped together as if such land had been held by one person.

(3)xx xx xx

(3A)xx xx xx

(3B) Where a family or a joint family consist of more than five members comprising a person and other members belonging to all or any of the following categories, namely:-

(i) minor son,

(ii) widow of a pre-deceased son,

(iii) minor son or unmarried daughter of a pre-deceased son, where his or her mother is dead,

Such family shall be entitled to hold land in excess of the ceiling area to the extent of one-fifth of the ceiling area for each member in excess of five, so however that the total holding of the family does not exceed twice the ceiling area; and, in such a case, in relation to the holding of such family, such area shall be deemed to be the ceiling area:

Provided that if any land is held separately also by any member of such family, the land so held separately by such member shall be grouped together with the land to such family for the purpose of determining the total holding of such family:

Provided further that where, in consequence of any member of such family holding any land in any other part of India outside the State, the ceiling area in relation to the family is reduced as provided in sub-section (3A), the one-fifth of the ceiling area as aforesaid shall be calculated with reference to the ceiling area as would have been applicable had no such land been held by such member in any other part of India.

(3C) Where a family or a joint family irrespective of the number of members includes a major son, then each major son shall be deemed to be a separate person for the purposes of sub-section (1)."

4. In accordance with the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top