N. L. UNTWALIA, P. N. SHINGHAL, A. N. RAY
Amritlal Nathubhai Shah: Keshavlal Nathubhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
Union Government Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SHINGHAL, J. :—The appeals by certificate are directed against a common judgment of the High Court of Gujarat dated May 4, 1972. We have heard them together and will dispose them of by a common judgment. The facts giving rise to the appeals are similar in essential respects and may be shortly stated.
2. There are large deposits of bauxite in Gujarat State. The State Government issued a notification on December 31, 1963, intimating that the lands in all the talukas of Kutch district and in Kalyanpur taluka of Jamnagar district had been reserved for exploitation of bauxite in the public sector. A similar notification was issued on February 26, 1964. In respect of all areas of Jamnagar and Junagarh districts. Even so, the appellants made applications to the State Government for grant of mining lease for bauxite in the reserved areas. There were no other applications to that effect, but the State Government rejected the applications of the appellants on the ground that, as had been notified, it had reserved the areas for the public sector. The appellants felt aggrieved and applied to the Central Governments orders. The revision applications were dismissed after obtaining the co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.