SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 372

A. N. RAY, M. H. BEG, P. N. SHINGHAL
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Parsini – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT:- This appeal is by certificate from the judgment dated 26 April, 1967 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Letters Patent Appeal No. 273 of 1963.

2. The respondent, Mst. Parsini, is the widow of Beer Chand. Beer Chand died on 26 March 1960 in an accident with a tractor belonging to the Punjab Public Works Department (Electricity Branch), Ludhiana.

3. The widow made an application under Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The Tribunal granted compensation of Rs.2000/- to the applicant.

4. The learned single Judge on appeal upheld the order of the Tribunal. Thereupon the respondent filed Letters Patent Appeal which was allowed by the High Court. The High Court awarded Rs.3000/- to each of the seven children and Rs.4,200/- to the widow.

5. Counsel for the State contended that the number of children was not seven. We have examined the evidence. The applicant stated that she had seven children. She mentioned three daughters and four sons. When she gave evidence they were all minor. That was sixteen years ago. There was no challenge to the evidence of the applicant. The High Court said that the Tribunal nowhere doubted the evidence as led by the applicant with regard to the inc





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top