SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 411

A. N. RAY, M. H. BEG, P. N. SHINGHAL
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Sita Ram Jaiswal – Respondent


Advocates:
G.L.SANGHI, GIRISH CHANDRA, PURSHOTTAM CHATTERJI, SUKUMAR GHOSH

Judgment

RAY, C.J.I. :- This appeal by certificate is from the judgment dated 11, April 1968 of the High Court at Calcutta.

2. The respondent filed this suit against the appellant in the High Court at Calcutta and claimed Rs. 76,691-2-0 with interest or in the alternative Rs. 78,204-8-4. The respondents case in short is that the respondent delivered to the defendant appellant pursuant to several orders from time to time goods described as Mac Intyre Sleeves and other goods. The respondent alleged in the plaint that the appellant "wrongfully purported to reject the Mac Intyre Sleeves" supplied by the respondent. The respondent further alleged that the rejection was unlawful inasmuch as the rejection was after lapse of reasonable time. The respondent claimed the sum mentioned in the plaint as reasonable price of the goods. The alternative case of the respondent is that the plaintiff respondent was entitled to the sum for supply of Mac Intyre Sleeves because the same were not supplied gratuitously.

3. The appellant denied in the written statement that there was any enforceable contract, and, therefore, the respondent was not entitled to sue for price of the goods delivered. The appellant















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top