SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 465

A. N. RAY, M. H. BEG, JASWANT SINGH
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
M. T. Joseph – Respondent


Advocates:
K.M.NAYAR, M.M.ABDUL KHADER, P.K.PALLI, T.S.KRISHNAMURTHY IYER

Judgment

BEG, J.:- These appeals by special leave raise the question whether the Kerala High Court had correctly interpreted and applied S. 8 of the Kerala Govt. Land Assignment Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the act) to the cases before us. This provision reads as follows:

"8. All provisions, restrictions, conditions and limitations over, contained in any Pattah or other document evidencing an assignment of Government land shall be valid and take effect according to their tenor, any rule of law or usage to the contrary notwithstanding."

2. The facts upon which the provision was sought to be applied are these: On 23 October, 1939, the Government of Travancore sanctioned a scheme for the reclamation of the Vimbana Lake upon terms and conditions which were set forth in a document dated 4 October, 1939. The agreement provided that one M. T. Joseph and his father on payment of Rs.10/- per acre, which were to be recovered in ten equal instalments, would be given possession of certain tracts of land which they undertook to reclaim. For the first two years after what is called the "Registry" of the names of two lessees no tax was to be levied. The "Registry" was liable to be cancelle











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top