SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 344

M. H. BEG, P. N. BHAGWATI
Tharoo Mal – Appellant
Versus
Puran Chand Pandey – Respondent


Advocates:
K.J.JOHN, MIRA BAHL, RANI ARORA, Y.S.Chitale, YOGESHAR PRASAD

JUDGMENT

BEG, C.J.I. :—The appellant before us by grant of special leave under Art. 136 of the Constitution is a partner in a firm carrying on the business of running a cinema house called "Jai Talkies" in the town of Pilibhit in Uttar Pradesh. The Municipal Board of Pilibhit passed a resolution on 11th of April, 1971, imposing a theatre tax of Rs. 25/- per show under Section 128 (1) (iii-a) read with Sections 296 and 299 of the Municipalities Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The resolution was duly published in a Hindi newspaper on 16 May, 1972, as required by Section 94 (3) read with S. 131 (1) (a) of the Act. The preliminary proposals for imposition of a tax were framed under S. 131 of the Act which reads as follows:

"131. Framing of preliminary proposals.- (1) Where a board desires to impose a tax, it shall, by special resolution, frame proposals specifying-

(a) the tax, being one of the taxes described in sub-section (1) of Section 128, which it desires to impose;

(b) the persons or class of persons to be made liable, and the description of property or other taxable thing or circumstances in respect of which they are to be made liable, except where and in so far as any s






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top