SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 330

A. D. KOSHAL, P. S. KAILASAM, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Rajendra Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Sen – Respondent


Judgment

KOSHAL, J.:- This is an appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment of a single Judge of the Allahabad High court declaring the election of the appellant named Rajendra Singh Yadav, who was the returned candidate from the Uttar Pradesh Assembly Constituency No. 314 (Mohammadabad, District Farrukhabad), held in the year 1974, to be void on the sole ground that he had been guilty of the commission of the corrupt practice specified in clause (5) of Section 123 of the Act, and further holding that "he is disqualified for a period of six years".

2. Seven candidates took part in the election contest, the appellants nearest rival being the Congress candidate Smt. Vidyavati Rathore (respondent No. 3) who secured 25736 votes as against 43844 polled in favour of the appellant who fought the battle as an independent candidate.

3. The petition under Section 81 of the Act was instituted in the High Court by two electors other than the candidates on various grounds including the commission by the returned candidate of different types of corrupt practices. The only ground found by the High to have been e




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top