D. A. DESAI, E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, N. L. UNTWALIA, P. S. KAILASAM, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Kamal Kanti Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CHANDRACHUD, CJI.. (For himself and for N. L. Untwalia, P. S. Kailasam and E. S. Vendkataramiah, JJ.) : - The disputes between promotees and direct recruits in various departments of the Government seem to have no end. No sooner does one round of litigation come to a decision than is another round started by one party or the other, sometimes alleging, as in these Writ Petitions, that important facts and circumstances were not taken into consideration in the earlier proceedings either because they were suppressed or because, though cited, they were overlooked or misunderstood. A virtual review is thus asked for, opening floodgates to fresh litigation. There are few other litigative areas than disputes between members of various services inter se, where the principle that public policy requires that all litigation must have an end can apply with greater force. Public servants ought not to be driven or required to dissipate their time and energy in Court-room battles. Thereby their attention is diverted from public to private affairs and their inter se disputes affect their sense of oneness without which no institution can function effectively. The constitution of Service Tri
reviewed : Jaisinghani v. Union of India
Bishan Sarup Gupta v. Union of India
Bishan Sarup Gupta v. Union of India
Union of India v. M. Jangnmayya
harmonised : Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Sankari Prasad v. Union of India
Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
referred to : Ore (India) Ltd. v. Regnl. A. C. S.
N.K. Chauhan v. State of Gujarat
Mervyn Coutinho v. Collector of Customs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.