SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 448

A. N. SEN, A. V. VARADARAJAN, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Gurdayal Singh Fiji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Hardayal Hardy, JITENDRA SHARMA, M.NATESAN, M.S.Dhillon, P.A.Francis, P.Gaur, R.N.Poddar

Judgment

AMARENDRA NATH SEN, J. :- Gurdayal Singh Fiji, a member of the Punjab Provincial Civil Service, has presented this writ petition in person and he has argued his own case in person.

2. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition appears to be against the non-inclusion of his name in the I. A. S. Select List.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is one of the seniormost persons in the service with a consistently good record of service on the whole, but because of two adverse remarks by two Officers, certificate of integrity has not been given to him. The petitioner submits that the adverse remarks made against him were mala fide and unjustified and the refusal to grant him a certtficate of integrity and to include his name in the I. A. S. Select List is wrongful and illegal.

4. As this writ petition may be disposed of on a short point, it does not become necessary for us to set out at length the various facts and circumstances of this case. The petitioner has taken us through the records and the various documents filed in support of his case made in the writ petition.

5. In view of the grievance made by the petitioner as to non-inclusion of his name in the S




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top