SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 60

Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, D. A. DESAI, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Padma Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Premier Insurance Company LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, CJI. :—This appeal by certificate of fitness arises out of the judgment of the Karnataka High Court

ated Jan. 9, 1976 in. Misc. First Appeal No. 19 of 1973.

2. On April 5, 1970, the appellants husband was driving a scooter, MYL 8574, on the Kasturba Road, Bangalore, when a goods truck, MYT 3298, knocked him dead. The owner of the truck had taken a statutory insurance policy with the respondent. The Premier Insurance Co. Ltd., Gandhinagar, Bangalore, which was operative from June 30, 1969 to June 29, 1970. The appellant filed an application before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, under S. 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, seeking compensation for her husbands death. The respondent denied its liability on the ground, amongst others, that its record did not disclose that it had issued any insurance policy in respect of the particular truck. On a consideration of the entire evidence, the Tribunal passed an award on Nov. 20, 1972, holding that the appellant was entitled to recover compensation in the sum of Rs. 60,000 for herself and her children. The Tribunal. limited the liability of the respondent-insurer to a sum of Rs. 50,000.

3. The responden













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top