SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 65

V. D. TULZAPURKAR, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Jageshwar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.Singh, DALVIR BHANDARI, H.M.SINGH, Prithvi Raj, R.C.Kohli, R.L.Kohli, Ranbir Yadav

Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, CJI. :- Eleven persons were tried by the learned Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, principally for offences under Sections 302 and 396 of the Penal Code. One of them, Manohar, was acquitted while the remaining 10 were sentenced to death. By a judgment, which leaves much to be desired, the High Court of Allahabad. set aside the order of conviction and sentence and acquitted all the accused. These appeals are by the State of U. P. against the order of acquittal recorded by the High Court.

2. In support of the charges levelled against the accused, the prosecution relied upon the evidence of five witnesses who claim to have identified them. These witnesses are: Sundi (P. W. 1), Shea Nandan (P. W. 12), Ram Bali (P. W. 18), Mani Prashad (P. W. 19) and Sham Behari (P. W. 27). In addition to the evidence of these eye witnesses, the prosecution relied upon certain recoveries made from or at the instance of the accused and the evidence of the Ballistic Expert, Shariq Alvi (P. W. 32).

3. The occurrence took place at about midnight between the 28th and 29th Oct., 1970 in a village called Chak Quazipur. Four persons, Ayodhya, his two sons Amar Singh and Kanchan, and a neighbour Thaku









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top