SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 193

D.A.DESAI, R.B.MISRA, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Delhi Cloth And General Mills Company LTD. : Arvind Mills LTD. : Madhusudan Vegetable Products Company LTD. : Modi Spinning And Wvg. Mills Company LTD. : Goetze India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.VERMA, A.N.HAKSAR, A.SUBASHINI, A.SUBBA RAO, ANIL SHARMA, ASHOK GROVER, B.R.AGRAWAL, D.N.Mishra, D.N.MISRA, DIVYANG K.CHHAYA, G.A.SHAH, G.C.GANDHI, H.K.PURI, HARISH N.SLAVE, HARISH SALVE, L.N.Sinha, M.G.RAMA CHANDRA RAO, M.N.SHROFF, MEERA MATHUR, MIRA MATHUR, NARAIN, O.C.MATHUR, O.P.MALHOTRA, P.C.BHARTARI, P.G.GOKHALE, P.H.Parekh, P.K.MUKHERJI, P.P.SINGH, R.P.BHATT, R.P.KAPUR, RAVINDER NARAYAN, Ravindra Narayan, S.K.Gambhir, S.S.Khanduja, S.S.RAY, S.T.DESAI, SANJAY PODDAR, SRI KUMAR, SUKUMAR SAHU, SUKUMARAN, SUKUMARAN SANJAY PODDAR, Talat Ansari, V.J.Francis, V.K.Bahl, VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

Judgment

DESAI, J. :- In this group of writ petitions under Art. 32 and appeals by special leave under Art. 136 of the Constitution, constitutional validity of Rule 3A of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 (Deposits Rules for short) introduced by Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 1978 which became operative from April 1, 1978 and incidentally of Section 58A of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act for short) inserted by Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974 which came into force on February 1, 1975 is challenged. The challenge proceeds on diverse grounds which may be briefly summarised.

2. At the very outset, it must be noticed that the factual matrix has little or practically no relevance in this case.

3. The contention put in the forefront was that in the absence of guidelines both S. 58A and the R. 3A of the Deposits Rules enacted in exercise of the power conferred by S. 58A confer arbitrary and uncanalised powers and hence are violative of Art. 14. Contravention of Art. 14 was canvassed for the additional reason that the power to exempt from the application of the rule confers wide discretion so that it can be used arbitrarily to pick and choose with the result

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top