SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 235

E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Satyendra Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Nath Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.SINGH, D.N.MUKHERJI, N.R.CHAUDHARY

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, CJI.: — Special Leave granted limited to the question of the propriety of briefing a soil to appear before his father.

2. In Bihar, there is an Association called the State Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. As if other forums do not provide enough opportunities for factious fights, there was an unseemly wrangle amongst the members of the Society over its day-to-day management. So much indeed, that inspired by the lofty ideal of preventing cruelty to animals, they forgot that they did not have to be unkind to their own brotherhood. Their petty disputes led to the filing of a suit in the Court of the learned Munsif, 3rd Court, Patna. That suit was instituted by respondent 1, who claims to be a life member of the Society. He filed an application in the suit for an injunction restraining the appellants and respondent 3 from interfering with the working of the Society. That application was allowed by the trial Court. The appeal filed against the order of interim injunction was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge VI, Patna. So much was enough litigative wastefulness. But a litigation, once begun, has to run its full course, particularly








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top