SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 180

Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, D. P. MADAN, RANGANATH MISRA
Kailash Pati Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bhubneshwari Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
RANI CHHABRA, YOGESHAR PRASAD

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, CJI.:—The purchaser of joint family property from a member of a joint Hindu family may have the right to file a general suit for partition against the members of the joint family and, indeed, that may be the proper remedy for him to adopt to effectuate his purchase. But, that question is of academic importance here since it appears that the property involved in this suit, which was purchased by the appellant from one of the members of the joint Hindu family, is the only joint family property available for being partitioned. There are, therefore, no equities to be adjusted as between the parties. Accordingly, we agree with the concurrent findings recorded by the trial Court, the District Court and the High Court and dismiss this appeal. There will be no order as to costs.

Appeal dismissed.

For Citation: AIR 1984 SC 1802

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top