SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 287

D. P. MADAN, RANGANATH MISRA, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
C. K. Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The points which arise in this appeal are the same as those which have been decided today by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 2627 of 1977, Ahmed Hussain Khan v. State of Andhra Pradesh heard along with Civil Appeal No. 2628 of 1977, S. Gopalan v. State, of Andhra Pradesh (reported in AIR 1984 SC 1985). In view of our judgment in two appeals, we allow this appeal also and reverse the judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and set aside the order appealed against. We direct the State of Andhra Pradesh to fix within one month from today the pension payable to the appellant from the date on which he became eligible for payment of pension, that is, from the date on which he retired from Government service on the basis that the maximum pension admissible under Clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 299 of the Hyderabad Civil Services Rules is Rs. 1,000 per month in the Government of India currency. We further direct the State of Andhra Pradesh to pay to the appellant the balance of the amount of pension payable to him for the past period according to such refixation within one month from the date of refixation of his pension.

2. The respondent will pay to the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top