SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
H. Anraj: Dipak Dhar – Appellant
Versus
Government Of T. N. : State Of W. B. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
TULZAPURKAR, J.:— These Writ Petitions and the Civil Appeal raise a common question of law, namely, whether sales tax can be levied by a State Legislature on the sale of the Lottery Tickets in the concerned State?
2. The facts giving rise to the aforesaid question lie in a narrow compass and in the writ petitions the question arises, out of the levy imposed for the first time on such sales of lottery tickets by an amendment made in the Tamil Nadu General Sales-tax Act 1959 with effect from January, 28, 1984 while in the civil appeal it arises out of a similar levy imposed for the first time by making suitable amendments in the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 with effect from May, 1, 1984.
3. Indisputably the subject of "Lotteries" organised either by the Government of India or by the Government of a State falls within the Union List (Entry 40 of List I) but in the absence of any law having been enacted by the Parliament on the subject the running of lotteries could be done by the Government of various States only under Art. 258(1) of the Constitution on entrustment of that function by the Union to the concerned State. Accordingly at the instance of the Tamil Nadu Govern
referred to : H Anraj v. State of Maharashtra
Kerala State Electricity Board v. Indian Aluminium Co
State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley and Co
distinguished : Swami Motor Transport P Ltd v. Sankaraswamigal Mutt
Anwar Khan Mehboob and Co v. State of M.P.
relied on : Firm A T B Mehtab Majid and Co v. State of Madras
referred to : Atiabari Tea Co Ltd v. State of Assam
A Hajee Abdul Shakoor and Co v. State of Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.