A. V. VARADARAJAN, O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V. D. TULZAPURKAR, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
K. Chandru: G. Kannan – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CHANDRACHUD, CJI.:— By these two writ. petitions, the petitioners ask for a writ of mandamus restraining the respondents front evicting the slum dwellers and pavement dwellers in the city of Madras, without providing alternative accommodation to them. They also pray that the respondents should provide basic amenities like water, drainage and electricity to the slum dwellers.
2. The State of Tamil Nadu enacted the Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 in order to eradicate slums which are likely to become a source of danger to public health or sanitation. It is alleged by the petitioners that, acting in pursuance of the provisions of the said Act, about 450 huts situated on the. Canal Bank Road adjoining the Loyola College were demolished on November 17, 1981. On the following day, the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu made a statement that the Government had decided, to demolish slums which had come into existence after June, 1977. On November 19,1981 the Chairman of the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board made a statement that alternative accommodation had been provided to persons who were evicted from the slums situated on the Canal Bank Road.
3. The Tamil Nad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.