E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation LTD. : D. P. Sharma: P. Tejraj Sharma: Karnatak. A State Tourism Devplopment Corporation: S. Narayana Bhatta: B. A. Jayaram: A. Ramanna Naik – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal: Union Of India: Union Of India: Karnataka State Road Transport Corpn: Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :—Special leave granted in all the cases.
2. These appeals raise common questions of law and may therefore, be disposed of by a common judgment. In exercise of its powers under S. 63(7) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Central Government specified 50 as the number of All India Tourist Vehicle Permits which may be granted by the Karnataka State Transport Authority. By S. 24 of Amending Act 47 of 1978, a proviso to S. 63(7) was introduced. We are concerned in these appeals with the vires and interpretation of this proviso. By the time the proviso came into force. 36 permits had been granted by the Karnataka State Transport Authority and 14 remained to be granted. There were as many as 495 applications for the grant of these 14 permits. By an order dated February 1, 1984, the SC directed the Karnataka State Transport Authority to dispose of these applications. The State Transport Authority, by its proceedings dated April 30, 1984, granted 11 out of the 14 permits to the Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation, one permit to the Indian Tourism Development Corporation and two permits to the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. A number of appeals
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.