SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 248

R. S. PATHAK, RANGANATH MISRA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
R. C. D'souza – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, K.RAM KUMAR, P.P.Rao, S.Relan

Judgement

RANGANATH MISRA, J.:- This appeal by special leave is against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in a writ appeal arising out of the judgment of a learned single Judge in an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution.

2. The respondent on taking premature retirement on compassionate ground from the Indian Army at the age of 33 was offered appointment as Assistant Commandant in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF for short) and was given appointment initially for a period of three years. Early in 1970 he was promoted on temporary basis as Commandant on the basis of selection. In October 1970, the President sanctioned his continued re-employment for one year as Commandant. The respondent was asked to opt for absorption. In the meantime, his promotional appointment as Commandant was extended from time to time. In June 1976, he was informed by the Director General of the C.R.P.F. that in view of the R. 107 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, he was not entitled for absorption in the Force. A representation of the respondent was rejected by the President. Thereupon, he applied to the Andhra Pradesh High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution for




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top