RANGANATH MISRA, R. S. PATHAK
Shubhlaxmi Mills LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Raj Krtshan Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
PATHAK, CJI. :— This appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Gujarat is directed against the judgment of the High Court on the following questions referred to it by the Appellate Tribunal :
"(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee cannot be denied the benefit of carry forward of development rebate?
2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in directing that the Income-tax Officer should determine the development rebate and such development rebate should be allowed to be carried forward and set off when profits are available and if, in. that year, the assessee fulfils the necessary requirements for such allowance like creation of adequate reserve?"
2. The assessee is a limited Company. It has a textile mill at Cambay in the State of Gujarat. For the assessment year 1962-63, the previous year being the calendar year 1961, the assessee claimed that a sum of Rs. 1,26,233 should be allowed as development rebate under S. 33 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income-tax Officer rejected the claim on the ground that the assessee had not created a reserv
Distinguished on : West Laikdihi Coal Co. Ltd., Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Addl.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. Vishnu Industrial Enterprises
REFERRED TO : Commissioner of Income Tax v. U. P. Hotel and Restaurants Ltd.
Dodballapur Spinning Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.