SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. PATHAK, CJI., M.H. KANIA, J.
The Broach Distt. Co-operative Cotton Sales Ginning and Pressing Society Ltd., Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income tax, Ahmedabad, Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 513-515 (NT) of 1975
Decided on 26-4-89.
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 81(i)(c) - Income tax - Agricultural products - Assessee is a co-operative society constituted under Co-operative Societies Act - Objects of society intend that it should press cotton and pack bundles for its individual members as well as other customers, to use its machinery for any useful work of its members, and to sell raw cotton, cotton seeds and other agricultural products - Assessee possesses a ginning and pressing factory to cater to needs of its members - It gets raw cotton from members, and gins and presses the cotton for marketing on behalf of its members - For rendering the services of ginning and pressing before selling the goods, the assessee charges the members a certain amount by way of ginning and pressing charges - It also charges commission for the sale of the finished product - Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, income of the Society from ginning and pressing was exempt under section 81(i)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it stood prior to its amendment – Held, High Court proceeded on the view that if a Society carries on certain activities which are exempted activities according to cls. (a) to (f) of S. 81(i) and certain other activities which are not exempted, profits and gains attributable to such non-exempted activities must necessarily be taxed - High Court observed that the assessee carried on ginning and pressing of cotton with the aid of power, and even if those activities are regarded as ancillary or incidental to its marketing activity they would not come within the category of exempted activities in view of proviso, and therefore they would have to be taxed - Court find ourselves unable to accept the view taken by the High Court - Court are of opinion that the assessee is entitled to exemption of profits and gains derived from the activity of entire business of ginning and pressing of cotton and marketing it by virtue of cl. (c) of S. 81(i) of Income-tax Act, and that High Court erred in holding to the contrary - In the result the appeals are allowed and the question referred by Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to High Court must be answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against Revenue - Appeals allowed.
JUDGMENT
PATHAK, CJI. :— These appeals by certificate granted by the High Court of Gujarat are directed against the judgment of the High Court answering the following question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee :-
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income of the Society from ginning and pressing was exempt under section 81(i)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it stood prior to its amendment on 1st April, 1968?"
2. The assessee is a co-operative society constituted under the Co-operative Societies Act. The objects of the society intend that it should press cotton and pack the bundles for its individual members as well as other customers, to use its machinery for any useful work of its members, and to sell raw cotton, cotton seeds and other agricultural products. The assessee possesses a ginning and pressing factory to cater to the needs of its members. It gets raw cotton from the members, and gins and presses the cotton for marketing on behalf of its members. For rendering the services of ginning and pressing before selling the goods, the assessee charges the members a certain amount by way of ginning and pressing charges. It also charges commission for the sale of the finished product.
3. In the course of assessment for the assessment years 1961-62 to 1963-64, the assessee claimed that the receipts from the ginning and pressing activities were exempt under S. 81(i)(c) of the Income-tax Act (as it stood then). The Income-tax Officer, however, declined to accept the claim on the ground that the assessee had been carrying out the process of ginning and pressing with the aid of power. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed the orders of the Income-tax Officer. In second appeal the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that having regard to the circumstance that the receipts were from members only, that there was a general market for ginnng and pressing cotton only and no evidence appeared of any dealing in raw cotton, the ginning and pressing activities were to be regarded as an integral part of the marketing activity, and therefore the receipts from those activities were not liable to tax by virtue of S. 81(i)(c). At the instance of the Revenue the Appellate Tribunal referred the question of law set out earlier to the High Court of Gujarat for its opinion.
4. For the purpose of contention raised before the High Court, and again before us the following provisions of S. 81 seem relevant :
"81. Income of Co-operative societies :-
Income-tax shall not be payable by a co-operative society-
(i) in respect of the profits and gains of business carried on by it, if it is-
(a) ...........................
(b) ..........................
(c) a society engaged in the marketing of the agricultural produce of its members; or
(d)............................
(e) a society engaged in the processing without the aid of power of the agricultural produce of its members; or
(f) ...........................
Provided that, in the case of a co-operative society which is also engaged in activities other than those mentioned in this clause, nothing contained herein shall apply to that part of its profits and gains as is attributable to such activities and as exceeds fifteen thousands rupees."
5. The High Court proceeded on the view that if a Society carries on certain activities which are exempted activities according to cls. (a) to (f) of S. 81(i) and certain other acitivities which are not exempted, the profits and gains attributable to such non-exempted activities must necessarily be taxed. The High Court observed that the assessee carried on ginning and pressing of cotton with the aid of power, and even if those activities are regarded as ancillary or incidental to its marketing activity they would not come within the category of exempted activities in view of the proviso, and therefore they would have to be taxed. We find ourselves unable to accept the view taken by the High Court. It is apparent that the ginning and p
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.