SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 214

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. PATHAK, CJI., S. NATARAJAN, J.
Sriniketan Co - operative Group Housing Society ltd., etc. etc., Appellants
Versus
Vikas Vihar Co - operative Group Housing Society Ltd. and others, etc. etc, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 2649 of 1989 etc. etc.
Decided on 4 - 5 - 1989.
Advocates appeared
Mr. A. K. Sen, Mr. A. K. Ganguli, Dr. Y. S. Chitale, Mr. G. L. Sanghi, Mr. G. N. Dixit and Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocates, Ms. Bina Gupta, Mrs. S. Roy, Mr. A. Tewari, Mr. Rashid Alvi, MR.S. P. Singh, Mr. Magan Bhai Barot, Mr. M. L. Lakhoty, Mr. P. S. Jha, Mr. M. M. Kashyap, Mr. P. H. Parekh, Mr. E. K. Jose, 1675 Mr. V. P. Singh, Mr. Arjun Bhandari, Mr. L. K. Bhushan, Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Mr. Badar Durrez Ahmed, Mr. Parjat Sinha, Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Rishi Kesh and Mr. Y. K. Jain, Advocates with them, for Appellants; Mr. K. Parasaran, Attorney General, Mr. B. Datta, Additional Solicitor General, Ms. A. Subhashini, Mr. M. L. Verma, Mr. A. K. Tewari, Mr. B. S. Chauhan, MR.S. K. Verma, Mr. Shiv Pujan Singh, Mr. M. N. Krishnamani and Mr. Sudarsh Menon, Advocates with them, for Respondents.

Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.Subhashini, ARJUN BHANDARI, Arun K.Sinha, ARVIND K.TEWARI, B.DUTTA, B.S.Chauhan, Badar Ahmed, BINA GUPTA, E.K.JOSE, G.L.SANGHI, G.N.DIKSHIT, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, KAPIL SIBAL, L.K.Bhushan, M.L.Lahoty, M.L.Verma, M.M.KASHYAP, M.N.KRISHNA MANI, MAGANBHAI R.BAROT, P.H.Parekh, P.S.JHA, PARIJAT SINHA, PRADIP MISHRA, RASHID ALVI, RISHI KESH, S.K.VERMA, S.P.SINGH, S.ROY, SHIV PUJAN SINGH, Sudarsh Menon, V.P.Singh, Y.K.Jain, Y.S.Chitale

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 14 – construction – Land - Co-operative Group Housing Society - Civil Writ Petition filed by Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd, contesting respondent in nine out of twelve appeals - In allowing the writ petition High Court quashed a general order of allotment of the Ministry of Urban Development allotting land to nine co-operative group housing societies and the individual order of allotment pursuant thereto issued to the nine societies regarding allotment of specified extents of land in their favour for construction of apartments for their members - All nine co-operative group housing societies affected by quashing of allotment orders have filed appeals to challenge judgment of the High Court - Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. and two other societies viz. Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd., who were not allotted land by the Ministry of Urban Development have filed other three appeals - Some of the non-allottee societies have appeared as intervenors in the appeals preferred by the nine co-operative societies who were allotted land by Government - Whether the land in question should be allotted to the co-operative societies at all – Held, in the course of the arguments, it was urged on behalf of some of allottee societies that they satisfied all norms fixed by Government including norm of first come first served and hence allotment order in their favour should be sustained - In same manner, some of non-allottee societies put forth a contention that they also satisfied all the requirements prescribed for allotment of land and hence there should be a direction given to Government to allot land to them - Court cannot examine the merit of these contentions because High Court left it open to the Government to consider the matter afresh, if it wants to allot the land to co-operative group housing societies - In the light of the discussion contained above, court are unable to accept the contentions of the allottee societies that High Court had erred in quashing the order of allotment - Appeals by the allottee societies have therefore to fail - Government has had the benefit of the amounts deposited by co-operative societies towards the cost of the land for all these years and the members of the societies have suffered loss of interest - Court therefore direct that in the event of the Government deciding not to allot the land to the co-operative societies or to allot the land only to the societies eligible for allotment as per norms and not to the other societies the Government should refund amounts paid by the concerned societies together with interest at 12 per annum from the date of deposit till the date of refund - In the result, the judgment of the High Court is affirmed subject to further direction given to the Government to refund moneys to the concerned societies together with interest at 12 per annum from the date of deposit till the date of refund - Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT

NATARAJAN, J. :— SLPs are granted.

2. These appeals by special leave arise out of and are directed against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi in Civil Writ Petition No. 806 of 1986 filed by Vikas Vihar Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd, the contesting respondent in nine out of the twelve appeals .In allowing the writ petition the High Court quashed a general order of allotment dated 31-3-1986 of the Ministry of Urban Development allotting 27 acres of nazuI land to nine co-operative group housing societies and the individual order of allotment dated 2-4-1986 pursuant thereto issued to the nine societies regarding the allotment of specified extents of land in their favour for construction of apartments for their members.

3. All the nine co-operative group housing societies affected by the quashing of the allotment orders have filed appeals to challenge the judgment of the High Court. Vikas Vihar Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. and two other societies viz. Suryakiran Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd., and Daffodila Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. who were not allotted land by the Ministry of Urban Development have filed the other three appeals. Their grievance is that the High Court, while rightly quashing the impugned orders of allotment, ought to have directed the Government to make fresh allotments after taking into consideration the preferential qualifications in their favour for allotment of land to them. Some of the non-allottee societies have appeared as intervenors in the appeals preferred by the nine co-operative societies who were allotted land by the Government. Having regard to the common questions involved in all these appeals, they were clubbed and heard together.

4. Some background material maybe set out for having a comprehensive perspective of the issues involved in the acquired lands in and around Delhi for construction of the capital city. These lands which vested in the Government of India are known as nazul lands. These lands were utilised for construction of Government Office buildings, residential buildings for Government servants and public utilities such as markets etc. Some lands were allotted to private individuals on perpetual lease from time to time for residential and commercial use, and also to social and cultural institutions, schools, hospitals and rehabilitation schemes etc. according to the policy of the Government of India from time to time. By an order made under the Allocation of Business Rules, the administration of these lands which are properties of the Union vests in the Ministry of Urban Development. Land and Development Office is the field office of the Ministry of Urban Development to allot these lands under orders of the Ministry and administer the leases. Later on, some of these nazul lands were placed at the disposal of the Delhi Improvement Trust for construction of buildings for being given to the public by allotment or auction. In the year 1957, the Delhi Development Act came to be passed and in terms of the Act, the Delhi Development Authority (for short the D. D.A.) was constituted and the Delhi Improvement Trust was merged with the D.D.A. After its formation, the D.D.A. acquired large areas of lands in Delhi for being developed and thereafter allotted or auctioned to the public on lease-hold basis. In 1961, the Government of India formulated certain policies for governing the development and distribution/allotment of lands to various institutions and individuals and one of those policies was to give priority to co-operative group housing societies in the matter of allotment of land. The Government also decided to discontinue the scheme of plotted development of lands and instead to make use Of the lands for construction of flats in multi-storeyed buildings by the D.D.A. or co-operative group housing societies by allotting, land to them.

5. It was also decided that due to scarcity of land in South Delhi, group housing societies would be allott

















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top