SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 699

R. S. PATHAK, RANGANATH MISRA
Elson Machines Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates:
DUSHYANT A.DAVE, G.RAMASVAMY, MANIK KARANJAVALA, R.KARANJAWALA, S.Relan

JUDGMENT

PATHAK, CJI. :— This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal on the question whether the appellant is disentitled to the concession granted by Notification No. 80/80-C.E. dated 19 June 1980 to small scale manufacturers in the matter of Central Excise duty.

2. The appellant is a private limited company. It has its registered office and factory in the State of Gujarat. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling electric motors.

3. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government issued Notification No. 80/80-C.E. dated 19th June 1980, which, as it stood during the relevant period, exempted from duty excisable goods falling under certain Item Numbers of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as specified in the Table annexed to the Notification and of the particular description set forth in that Table. But paragraph 2 of the Notification declared :

" Nothing contained in this notification shall apply to a manufacturer,-

(i) if the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods by him or on his beha














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top