SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. PATHAK, CJI., E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, RANGANATH MISRA, M.N. VENKATACHALIAH AND N.D. OJHA, JJ.
Union Carbide Corporation, Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents
Advocates appeared :
Mr. Anil B. Dewan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. J.B. Dadachanji, Mr. A. K. Verma, Advocates with him, for Appellant; Mr. K. Parasaran, Attorney General, Mr. A. Nariarputham, Miss. A Subhashini and Mr. C. L. Sahu, Advocates, with him, for Respondents.
India Citizens - Counter-offers - Complex issues of law - Bhopal Gas disaster - Whether citizens of country are assured protection of a legal system which could be said to be adequate in a comprehensive sense in such contexts arise - Whether within or out side India of Indian citizens public or private entities are hereby extinguished including without limitation each of claims filed or to be filed under Bhopal Gas Leak Diaster (Registration and Processing of Claims) Scheme 1985 and all such civil proceedings in India are hereby transferred to this Court and are dismissed with prejudice – Held, All of those who invoke corrective-processes in accordance with law shall be heard and Court will do what law and course of justice requires - Matter concerns interests of a large number of victims of a mass disaster - Court directed settlement with earnest hope that it would do them good and bring them immediate relief, for tomorrow might be too late for many of them - But case equally concerns credibility of, and public confidence in, judicial process - If owing to pre-settlement procedures being limited to main contestants in appeal, benefit of some contrary or supplemental information or material, having a crucial bearing on fundamental assumptions basic to settlement, have been denied to Court and that, as a result, serious miscarriage of justice, violating constitutional and legal rights of persons affected, has been occasioned, it will be the endeavour of this Court to undo any such injustice - But that, Court reiterate, must be by procedures recognised by law - Those who trust this Court will not have cause for despair - Order accordingly.
Judgment
O R D E R D/- 14th Feb., 1989
Having given our careful consideration for these several days to the facts and circumstances of the case placed before us by the parties in these proceedings, including the pleadings of the parties, the mass of data placed before us, the material relating to the proceedings in the Courts in the United States of America, the offers and counter-offers made between the parties at different stages during the various proceedings, as well as the complex issues of law and fact raised before us and the submissions made thereon, and in particular the enormity of human suffering occasioned by the Bhopal Gas disaster and the pressing urgency to provide immediate and substantial relief to victims of the disaster, we are of opinion that the case is pre-eminently fit for an overall settlement between the parties covering all litigations, claims, rights and liabilities related to and arising out of the disaster and we hold it just, equitable and reasonable to pass the following order :
2. We order :
(1) The Union Carbide Corporation shall pay a sum of U. S. Dollars 470 millions (Four hundred and seventy millions) to the Union of India in full settlement of all claims, rights and liabilities related to and arising out of the Bhopal Gas disaster.
(2) The aforesaid sum shall be paid by the Union Carbide Corporation to the Union of India on or before 31 March, 1989.
(3) To enable the effectuation of the settlement, all civil proceedings related to and arising out of the Bhopal Gas disaster shall hereby stand transferred to this Court and shall stand concluded in terms of the settlement, and all criminal proceedings related to and arising out of the disaster shall stand quashed wherever these may be pending.
A memorandum of settlement shall be filed before us tomorrow setting forth all the details of the settlement to enable consequential directions, if any, to issue.
3. We may record that we are deeply indebted to learned counsel for the parties for the dedicated assistance and the sincere cooperation they have offered the Court during the hearing of the case and for the manifest reasonableness they have shown in accepting the terms of settlement suggested by this Court.
O R D E R D/- 15th Feb., 1989
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and having taken into account the written memorandum filed by them, we make the following order further to our order dated 14 February, 1989 which shall be read with and subject to this order :
1. Union Carbide India Ltd., which is already a party in numerous suits filed in the District Court at Bhopal, and which have been stayed by an order dated 31 December, 1985 of the District Court, Bhopal, is joined as a necessary party in order to effectuate the terms and conditions of our order dated 14 February, 1989 as supplemented by this order.
2. Pursuant to the order passed on 14 February, 1989 the payment of the sum of U.S. $ 470 Millions (Four Hundred and Seventy Millions) directed by the Court to be paid on or before 31 March, 1989 will be made in the manner following :
(a) A sum of U.S. $ 425 Millions (Four Hundred and Twenty Five Millions) shall be paid on or before 23 March, 1989 by Union Carbide Corporation to the Union of India, less U.S. $ 5 Millions already paid by the Union Carbide Corporation pursuant to the order dated 7 June, 1985 of Judge Keenan in the Court proceedings taken in the United States of America.
(b) Union Carbide India Ltd. will pay on or before 23 March, 1989 to the Union of India the rupee equivalent of U.S. $ 45 Millions (Forty Five Millions) at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of payment.
(c) The aforesaid payments shall be made to the Union of India as claimant and for the benefit of all victims of the Bhopal Gas Disaster under the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Registration and Processing of Claims) Scheme, 1985, and not as fines, penalties, or punitive damages.
3. Upon full payment of the sum referred to in paragraph 2 above :
(a) The Union of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.