SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI CJI., B.C. RAY, M.H. KANIA, K.N. SAIKIA, AND S.C. AGRAWAL, JJ.
Committee for Protection of Rights of ONGC Employees and others, Petitioners
Versus
Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Dehradun and another, Respondents
Writ Petn. (Civil) No. 1152 of 1988, D/- 23-3-1990.
Advocates appeared :
Mr. M. K. Ramamurthi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R. C. Pathak, Mr. Naresh Mathur, Mr. Sudhir Kumar and Ms. Baby Lal, Advocates with him, for Petitioners; Mr. B. Dutt, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R. K. Joshi and Mr. S. K. Jain, Advocates with him, for Respondents.
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act - Section 12 - Oil & Natural Gas Commission (Terms and Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 3 - Oil & Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959 - Section 13 - Constitution of India - Article 32 – Employment and Service matter - Provision for transfer of service - Pension - Scheme of Contributory Provident Fund, by way of retiral benefit - Commission was initially formed as a Department of Government of India and it continued to be so till October 15, 1959, when ONGC Act was enacted and Commission was established as a statutory body under said Act. Section 13 of ONGC Act makes provision for transfer of service of existing employees to Commission on same tenure, remuneration and terms and conditions as they would have held, if Commission had not been established, until such tenure, remuneration and terms and conditions are duly altered by Commission - In proviso of Sub- Section (1) of Section 13 of ONGC Act, it is further provided that tenure, remuneration and terms and conditions of service of any such employee shall not be altered to his disadvantage without previous approval of Central Government - Held, Court held that in view of S. 12 of Provident Fund Act, such deductions were not permissible and that entire amount of pension should be paid to petitioner without deduction - This decision has no application to instant case because in that case petitioner before this Court was entitled to receive pension\n under voluntary retirement scheme at time when provisions of Provident Fund Act became applicable to Burmah Shell and right to receive pension was part of terms of employment of said petitioner - In present case it cannot be said that on date of application of Provident Fund Scheme to Commission, petitioners were entitled to receive pension and benefit of pension was a part of terms of employment of petitioners on that date - For reasons mentioned above, it must be held that persons who were employed in temporary capacity with Commission when it was being run as a Department of Government of India prior to enactment of ONGC Act and who were subsequently absorbed in Commission, as established under the said Act, are not entitled to pension in addition to Provident Fund benefits to which they are entitled under provisions of Provident Fund Act - Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT
S.C. AGRAWAL, J.:- The only question which arises for consideration in this writ petition, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, is whether persons who were employed in temporary capacity with the Oil & Natural Gas Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), when it was being run as a Department of the Government of India prior to the enactment of the Oil & Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the ONGC Act) and who were subsequently absorbed in the Commission, as established under the said Act, are entitled to pension, in addition to the Provident Fund benefits to which they are entitled under the provisions of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act (hereinafter referred to as the Provident Fund Act).
2. The Commission was initially formed as a Department of the Government of India and it continued to be so till October 15, 1959, when the ONGC Act was enacted and the Commission was established as a statutory body under the said Act. Section 13 of the ONGC Act makes provision for transfer of service of the existing employees to the Commission on the same tenure, remuneration and terms and conditions as they would have held, if the Commission had not been established, until such tenure, remuneration and terms and conditions are duly altered by the Commission. In the proviso of Sub- Section (1) of Section 13 of the ONGC Act, it is further provided that the tenure, remuneration and terms and conditions of service of any such employee shall not be altered to his disadvantage without the previous approval of the Central Government. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 32 of the ONGC Act the Commission, with the previous approval of the Central Government, has made the Oil & Natural Gas Commission (Terms and Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), In Clause 2(b) of Regulation 3, it has been provided that nothing in the Regulation shall operate to deprive any employee of any right or privilege to which he is entitled by the terms or conditions of service, or any agreement, subsisting between such person and the Government.
3. By Notification No. GSR 705, dated May 16, 1961, Schedule I to the Provident Fund Act was amended so as to make the provisions of the said Act applicable to any industry engaged in the manufacture of petroleum or natural gas exploration, prospecting, drilling or production with effect from June 30, 1961. By another Notification No. GSR 706, dated May 16; 1961, issued under Section 1(3)(b) of the Provident Fund Act the provisions of the said Act were made applicable to establishments engaged in the storage or transport or distribution of petroleum or natural gas or products of either petroleum or natural gas with effect from June 30, 1961. A corresponding amendment was made in the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Provident Fund Scheme), by Notification dated June 5, 1961, whereby Sub-Clause (xviii) was inserted in Clause (b) of sub-para (3) of para 1 of the said scheme and thereby the Provident Fund Scheme was made applicable, with effect from June 30, 1961, to factories relating to petroleum or natural gas exploration, prospecting, drilling or production and petroleum or natural gas refining and establishments engaged in the storage or transport or distribution of petroleum or natural gas or products of either petroleum or natural gas covered by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Nos. G.S.R. 705 and 706, dated May 16, 1961, respectively. As a result of the. aforesaid amendments introduced in the Provident Fund Act and the Provident Fund Scheme, the provisions of the Provident Fund Act and the Provident Fund Scheme became applicable to the Commission with effect from June 30, 1961.
4. The petitioners in this writ petition represent the employees who were employed on temporary basis with
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.