K. N. SAIKIA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, S. C. AGRAWAL, K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, M. H. KANIA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Sukumar Sengupta – Respondent
Judgment
SABYASACHI MUKHARJ1, C.J.I. :- This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta dated 19th Sept., 1986.
2. The Indian Independence Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ) was passed by the British Parliament. This Act came into force on and from 15th August, 1947, which was the appointed day and under the Act, as from the appointed day, two independent dominions were to be set up in place of the existing India known, respectively as India and Pakistan. Two independent dominions were set up in place of the existing Indian Union. Section 3(1) of the Act provided, inter alia, that as from the appointed day the Province of Bengal as constituted under the Government of India Act, 1935 shall cease to exist and in lieu thereof two new provinces known respectively as East Bengal and West Bengal shall be constituted under Sec. 3(3) of the Act. Under S. 3(3) of the Act, it was provided that the boundaries of the new provinces as aforesaid shall be such as may be determined whether before or after the appointed day by the award of a Boundary Commission appointed or to be appointed by the Governor General in th
relied on : A.K. Roy v. Union of India
State of H. P. v. Umed Ram Shama
State of H.P.v.A Parent of a Student of Medical College, Simla
referred to : Re the Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves
Ram Kishore Sen v. Union of India
referred to : Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N. Kapoor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.