SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RANGANATH MISRA, CJI., M.H. KANIA, KULDIP SINGH, JJ.
M.C. MEHTA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA, OTHERS.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029 of 1985
Decided on 14-3-1991
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - Public interest litigation sector - Regulation of air pollution - Power for Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking - Environmental pollution - Problem of environmental pollution is global in an increasingly small world and concerns all countries irrespective of their size, level of development or ideology - Notwithstanding political division of world into national units, oceanic world is an interconnected whole; and winds that blow over countries are also one - Pollution is capable of moving from continent to continent - If USSR carries out a nuclear test, fall-out may be carried by winds to any part of world and such fall-out of irresponsible disposal of radioactive waste from a remote energy plant in one country may turn out to have greater adverse effect on neighbouring countries than danger of a fullfledged war - Held, The Ministry has agreed that a retired Judge of this Court could act as Chairman and has suggested that Shri M.C. Mehta, the petitioner herein and Chairman of Central Pollution Control Board may be made Members of Committee – Court find this suggestion of the Ministry acceptable subject to certain modifications – Court inclined to take view that Association of Indian Automobile Manufacturers could be taken as a member of Committee and Committee would also have power to co-opt experts not exceeding three for its efficient working from time to time. Shri Justice K.N. Saikia who has recently retired as a Judge of this Court is appointed as Chairman of Committee with Shri N.S. Tiwana, Shri M.C. Mehta and Shri S.G. Shah as Members - Joint Secretary in the Ministry of a Environment and Forests shall be convenor Secretary of Committee - Committee may be constituted with effect from March 18, 1991, under an appropriate notification of Union Government in relevant Ministry - The terms of reference for time being as recommended by Ministry – Order accordingly.
JUDGMENT
RANGANATH MISRA, C.J.I. — This is an application under Article 32 of the Constitution in the public interest litigation sector. A practising advocate who is the Chairman of the Environment Protection Cell operating at Delhi is the petitioner. This Court has been asked to issue directions for closing down of hazardous industries located in the densely populated areas of Delhi and for regulation of air pollution caused by automobiles operating in the area as also the thermal units generating power for the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (hereafter referred to as DESU).
2. The Union Territory of Delhi has a total population of about 96 lakhs, out of which the urban area consisting of old Delhi, New Delhi and the Cantonment has a population of around 90 lakhs. By 1947 when the country became independent, Delhi had a population of a little over 5 lakhs. In these little more than two scores of years the population has, thus, multiplied by 19 times. Though it is a spread out city, in some pockets, the density of population is very high and these have become congested.
3. The problem of environmental pollution is global in an increasingly small world and concerns all countries irrespective of their size, level of development or ideology. Notwithstanding political division of the world into national units, the oceanic world is an interconnected whole; and winds that blow over the countries are also one. Pollution is capable of moving from continent to continent. If USSR carries out a nuclear test, the fall-out may be carried by the winds to any part of the world and such fall-out of irresponsible disposal of radioactive waste from a remote energy plant in one country may turn out to have greater adverse effect on the neighbouring countries than the danger of a fullfledged war. Informed public mind is already agitated over the polluting effect of the Gulf War and the common concern of the entire homosapien race is obsessed by the apprehension of acid rain, toxic effect on the seas and even on the atmosphere.
4. The awareness of interaction of man with his environment is of recent origin. The Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in June 1972 stated:
"Man is both creature and moulder of his environment, which gives him physical substance and affords him the opportunity forintellectual, moral, social and spiritual growth. In the long and tortuous evolution of the human race on this planet a stage has been reached when, through rapid acceleration of science and technology, man has acquired the power to transform his environment in countless ways and on an unprecedented scale. Both aspects of mans environment, the natural and the manmade, are essential to his well-being and to the enjoyment of the basic human rights - even the right of life itself."
Principle No. 1 of the same Declaration went on to say: "Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being, and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations ...."
5. The closeness of the undeveloped and underdeveloped communities to nature is not found in the developed ones. Our ancestors had realised the importance of the tie between man and his environment. The Samaveda notes the Flute of Divine Love by saying:
"Listen to the melodious music of the divine poet. He plays upon the flute of love, the notes soar to high heaven and reach the distant stars and dance on the raging waves of the sea. The earth, the sea, the sky, the stars are all woven together by the soft strains of the divine music. Its vibrants echo through the corridors of time in the endless canopy of the sky."
6. Norman Myers quoted in Sir Edmond Hillarys Ecology 2000 has rightly observed:
"The fate of African environments is thus determined not only by local circumstances. It is influenced, in part at least,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.