SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 674

KULDIP SINGH, M. H. KANIA, RANGANATH MISRA
Jogendra Lal Saha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT:— Appellant had entered into a contract with the State of Bihar in the year 1968 for a period of three years in the matter of appropriating Tendu Leaves from certain forests of the State of Bihar in the Dumka division stipulating to pay the price in three instalments spread over the three years for which the contract was valid. There is no dispute that the first annual instalment had been paid. Nor is there any dispute that the other two had not been paid. At a point of time when the third one had not become due and in regard to the second there had been default, proceedings under the Bihar Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914, were initiated for recovery of the two instalments on the requisition of the forest officer after adjustment of the security deposit and the price obtained at a re-auction. The appellant challenged the action taken in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Patna High Court. The Patna High Court by the impugned decision, AIR 1973 Pat 98, dismissed the petition and upheld the action. That has led to this appeal by special leave.

2. The main stand taken in support of the appeal before us is that once the contract was rescind
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top