SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.N. SINGH, CJI., KULDIP SINGH, J.
N.S.K. Nayar and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petns. (Civil) Nos. 4525-33 of 1985, D/-12-12-1991
Telegraph Engineering Service (Class I) Rules, 1965 - Rules 3, 5, 26, 27 and 28 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 16 - Promotion of permanent - Appointment by promotion to junior time scale in service shall be mane by selection on merit from among officers of Telegraph Engineering Service Class-II ordinarily with not less than eight years approved service in Class II on recommendations of a duly constituted Departmental Promotion Committee and in consultation with the Commission period of probation shall be two years - Appointments to the Senior Time Scale in service shall be made by promotions of officers in Junior Time Scale in order of seniority subject to rejection of the Unit (unfit?) - A directly recruited Assistant Divisional Engineer shall not ordinarily be promoted as Divisional Engineer unless he has put in five years service and has passed the prescribed departmental tests - Held, Court have given our thoughtful consideration to question as to what relief under circumstances can be given to petitioners and other officers similarly situated - While doing justice to the petitioners we do not wish to cause any prejudice to the direct recruits - Rule 27(a) of Rules provide that a direct recruit to JTS shall not ordinarily be promoted to STS unless he has put in five years service in JTS - Taking clue from the said Rule Court hold that promoters officers who have worked in STS for a continuous period of five years and are holding posts to-date shall be deemed to be regular members of Group A Service in STS - They shall be entitled to count their seniority in STS from date of completing said period of five years and shall be entitled to be considered for further promotion to JAG and SAG on basis of said seniority - Petitions allowed
JUDGMENT
KULDIP SINGH, J.:- The petitioners are promotee-members of the Indian Telecommunication Service Group A (hereinafter called Group A Service). They are working as officiating Divisional Engineers in the Senior Time Scale. The recruitment and conditions of service of the persons appointed to Group A Service are governed by statutory rules called "The Telegraph Engineering Service (Class I) Rules, 1965 (hereinafter called the Rules). Rules 3, 5, 26, 27 and 28 which are relevant are reproduced hereunder:
"3. Composition of the Service:-There shall be four grades in the Services namely: -
i) Junior Time Scale Rs. 400-400-450-30600-35-670-EB-35-950.
ii) Senior Time Scale Rs. 700-40-1 1 0050/2-1250.
iii) Junior Administrative Grade Rs. 130060-1600.
iv) Senior Administrative Grade Rs. 1800100-2000.
5. Filling of vacancies in the Junior Time Scale:-
Fifty percent of the vacancies in the Junior Time Scale in service will be filled by competitive examination as provided in part II of these rules and fifty per cent. reserved for promotion as provided in Part Ill of these rules.
26. Appointment by promotion to the junior time scale in the service shall be mane by selection on merit from among officers of the Telegraph Engineering Service Class-II ordinarily with not less than eight years approved service in Class II on the recommendations of a duly constituted Departmental Promotion Committee and in consultation with the Commission. The period of probation shall be two years.
27. (a) Appointments to the Senior Time Scale in the service shall be made by promotions of officers in the Junior Time Scale in the order of seniority subject to the rejection of the Unit (unfit?). A directly recruited Assistant Divisional Engineer shall not ordinarily be promoted as Divisional Engineer unless he has put in five years service and has passed the prescribed departmental tests.
(b) Posts in the senior time scale may, however, be filled as a purely temporary measure, in an officiating capacity to hold charge by the promotion of permanent members of Telegraph Engineering and Wireless Service, Class II, who are on the approved list for promotion to the Junior Time scale.
28. Appointments to the Junior Administrative Grade in the Service shall be made by selection on merit from amongst officers ordinarily with not less than five years permanent service in Senior Time Scale of T.E.S. on the recommendations of a duly constituted D.P.C."
2. The petitioners who were permanent members of Telegraph Engineering Service Class II, were promoted to the Senior Time Scale of Group A Service under Rule 27(b) of the Rules during the period 1975 to 1979. Their appointment under the Rules was purely temporary in officiating capacity and to hold charge. It is, however, not disputed that petitioners 2 to 9 are continuously working in the Senior Time Scale till date. Petitioner No. 1 retired, in the year 1987, from a post in the Senior Time Scale. The question for our consideration is whether the service rendered by the petitioners in the Senior Time Scale for over a decade entitles them to claim that they are regular holders of the posts in the Senior Time Scale of Group A service.
We may notice the Scheme of the Rules relevant for the purposes of the present petition. Under Rule 3 of the Rules the Group A Service consists of four grades namely, Junior Time Scale (JTS), Senior Time Scale (STS), Junior Administrative Grade (JAG) and Senior Administrative Grade (SAG). JTS is the starting point of Group A Service. Rules 5 and 26 provide that the vacancies in the JTS are to be filled 50% by direct recruitment and 50% by promotion from the Telegraph Engineering Service Class-II. Rule 27(a) lays down that the vacancies in the next higher grade of STS are to be filled on the basis of seniority in the JTS subject to rejection of the unfit. Direct recruits in the JTS are ordinarily not eligible to be promoted to STS till the time they have put in five years of service. Rule 27(b) provide
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.