KULDIP SINGH, P.B.SAWANT, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
H. R. Adyanthaya – Appellant
Versus
Sandoz India LTD. – Respondent
ORDER
In view of the conflict between three three-Judge Bench decisions of this Court in May & Baker (India) Ltd. v. Workmen{(1961) 2 LLJ 94 : AIR 1967 SC 678}, Western India Match Co. Ltd. v. Workmen{(1964) 3 SCR 560 : AIR 1964 SC 472 : (1963) 2 LLJ 459} and Burmah Shell Oil Storage & Distribution Co. of India v. Burmah Shell Management Staff Association{(1970) 3 SCC 378} on the one hand and later three three-Judge Bench decisions in S.K. Verma v. Mahesh Chandra (1983) 4 SCC 214, Ved Prakash Gupta v. Delton Cable India (P) Ltd. (1984) 2 SCC 569 and Arkal Govind Raj Rao v. Ciba Geigy of India Ltd., Bombay{(1985) 3 SCC 371 on the other, on the interpretation of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently the status of the medical/sales representatives prior to 6-3-1976 when the Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 was brought into force and also prior to 21-8-1984 when the definition of "workman" under the Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act was amended, we are of the view that propriety demands that the matter be heard by a larger Bench. We, therefore, refer the matter to a five-Judge Bench to be constituted by the learned Chief
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.