SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1077

A. S. ANAND, S. MOHAN, M. N. VENKATACHALIAH
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Kolluni Ramaiah – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, C.V.SUBBA RAO, GIRISH CHANDRA, VIMAL DAVE

Judgment

MOHAN, J.:- Delay condoned. Permission to prefer special Leave Petitions granted.

2. Leave granted.

3. The facts leading to these appeals are as under:

An extent of 6.50 acres of land in village Marripalam Taluk and District Visakhapatnam was requisitioned for defence purposes in the year 1942. Subsequently they were acquired under the Requisitioning & Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 (Central Act 30 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on 11-1-1972 along with adjoining land of an extent of 68.25 acres. The competent authority fixed compensation at the rate of Rs. 10/- per square yard under Section 8(3) read with Rule 9(l) of the Act. Being dissatisfied with the compensation, the owners of the property sought a reference to the arbitrator. By an award dated 28-3-1981, the arbitrator (District Judge) awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 15/- per square yard and solatium at 15% and interest at 6% from the date of publication of Form J Notification. Accordingly, the enhanced amount was deposited in court through Special Petition LA (defence) Visakhapatnam.

4. Still not being satisfied with the decision of the arbitrator, the respondent Kolluni Ramaiah and th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top