SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 122

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MOHAN
Bhola Nath Varshney – Appellant
Versus
Mulk Raj Madan – Respondent


Judgment

M. K. MUKHERJEE, J.:- This appeal by special leave has been filed by the landlord against the judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court allowing the Civil Writ Petition of the respondent-tenant.

2. After serving a notice in accordance with Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, the landlord instituted a suit for eviction in the Court of Small Causes, Moradabad on July 23, 198 1. He contended that the tenanted building was constructed in 1974 and as ten years had not elapsed since then the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (Act for short) did not apply to it. He further contended that even if it was assumed that the Act applied the tenant was not entitled to its benefits as he had not complied with the requirement of Section 39. In resisting the suit the tenant refuted both the above contentions of the landlord and submitted that as none of the grounds mentioned in sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the Act, on which only a tenant could be evicted, was made out no decree for ejectment could be passed against him.

3. The trial Court dismissed the suit holding that the Act applied to the building and none of the grounds referred to




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top