SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 49

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, A. M. AHMADI
Suresh Chand – Appellant
Versus
Gulam Chisti – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K.GARG, K.B.ROHTAGI, R.K.GARG

Judgment

AHMADI, J.:- The short question which arises for our consideration in this

Appeal by special leave is whether a tenant of a premises constructed in 1967 is entitled to the protection of S. 39 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (Act No. 13 of 1972 as amended by Act No. 17 of 1985), hereinafter called the Act, in an eviction suit instituted before the commencement of the Act. The Act came into force w.e.f. 15th July, 1972 by virtue of the notification issued by the State Government in exercise of power conferred by sub-section (4) of S. 1 of the Act, vide Notification No. 3409 / XXIX-59-72 dated 27th June, 1972 published in the U. P. Government Gazette, Extra, dated 1st July, 1972. The Act was enacted for inter alia regulation of letting and eviction of tenants from certain classes of buildings situate in urban areas specified in sub-section (3) of S. 1. Section 2 indicates the buildings to which the Act shall not apply. We are concerned with sub-section (2) of S. 2, the relevant part whereof reads as under :

"Except as provided in sub-section (5) of S. 12, sub-section ( 1 -A) of S. 21, sub-sec. (2) of S. 24, Sections 24-A, 24-B,









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top