SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1162

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, C.J.I. AND S. MOHAN, J.
English Medium Students Parents Association, Petitioner
Versus
State of Karnataka and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. (C) No. 536 of 1991, with Civil Appeals Nos. 8856-57 of 1989, D/-8-12-1993.
WITH
State of Karnataka and others, Appellants
Versus
Channagioraoi Taluk Urdu Schools Betterment Committee and others, Respondents.

Advocates:
B.V.ACHARYA, M.VIRAPPA, Maya Rao, Mela Ram Ghana, Navin Singh, SUDAMA OJHA

Headnote:

Education Law – Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 14, 29 and 30 - Higher Secondary Schools – Issue regarding change of Language - Government of Karnataka, wedded to cause of promotion of Kannada, appointed a Committee of six persons with Dr. V. K. Gokak as Chairman and referred following questions Should Sanskrit remain as subject for study in school syllabus - If so, how to retain it without its being an alternative for Kannada - Would it be proper to have Kannada as a compulsory subject as per Three Language Formula and should the option of selecting the remaining two languages be left to students themselves - Students coming from outside State and joining VIII, IX or X Standard and who have not studied any of languages listed as First Language may be allowed to take Additional English or Hindi as First Language - Teaching of Kannada from III Standard in Non-Kannada Schools will commence from academic year itself and language pattern for High Schools prescribed in para 1 above will come into effect from academic - Aggrieved by order some of educational institutions preferred writ petitions in High Court of Karnataka - Contended that order was violative of rights of minorities under Articles 14, 29 and 30 of Constitution – Held, A careful reading of above G.O. would clearly indicate that element of compulsion at the primary stage is no longer there because G.O. is unequivocal when it says from 1 st to 4th Standards mother tongue will be medium of instruction, only one language from Appendix-I will be compulsory subject of study - From 3rd Standard onwards Kannada will be an optional subject for non-Kannada speaking students - It is to be taught on a voluntary basis there being no examination at end of year in Kannada language - Majority opinion of High Court has approached matter in a proper perspective – Court have already extracted the relevant portions of judgment - Sting of earlier G.Os. and orders was element of compulsion especially children belonging to linguistic minorities from first year of the primary school making Kannada as sole First language in the secondary schools - Such a provision is violative of Articles 29 and 30 of Constitution – Court have no difficulty in upholding well-considered judgment of High Court - Writ petition dismissed.

Judgment

MOHAN, J.:- All these cases can be dealt with under a common judgment since the issue involved is the same. We will first take up the writ petition.

2. The Government of Karnataka, wedded to the cause of promotion of Kannada, appointed a Committee of six persons with Dr. V. K. Gokak as the Chairman and referred the following questions:

(1) Should Sanskrit remain as the subject for study in the school syllabus?

(2) If so, how to retain it without its being an alternative for Kannada?

(3) Would it be proper to have Kannada as a compulsory subject as per the Three Language Formula and should the option of selecting the remaining two languages be left to students themselves?

3. The Committee submitted its report dated 27th January, 1981 which is popularly known as Dr. Gokak Committee Report . The gist of the recommendations is as under:-

(1) Kannada should be introduced as a compulsory subject for all children from 3rd Standard;

(2) Kannada should be the sole first language for the Higher Secondary Schools (i.e., 8th, 9th and 10th Standards) carrying 150 marks, and this should be implemented for Kannada speaking people from 1981-82 itself and in respect of others 1986-87, after taking necessary steps to teach Kannada to them from the 3rd Standard from the academic year 1981-82 itself.

4. On a consideration of the abovesaid report, the State Government passed an order dated 30-4-82 which is to the following effect :

"Order No. Ed. 113 SOH 79, Bangalore, Dated 30th April, 1982.

Government have carefully examine the recommendations of the Committee and having regard to all aspects of the matter are pleased to order as follows:

1. At the Secondary School level, the language pattern to be adopted will be as follows:-

A. First Language:

Kannada or Mother Tongue (Urdu, Tamil, Telugu, Marathi, English, Hindi) to carry 150 marks.

B. Two other languages from the following:

Kannada, Hindi, English, Sanskrit, Arabic, Persian, Urdu, Telugu, Marathi to carry 100 marks each.

Note : (1) Students offering a language other than Kannada as First Language will study Kannada as First Language will study Kannada as a compulsory language and any one of the remaining languages (from Group B) both of which will be examination subjects for the S.S.L.C.

(2) Students offering Kannada as First language will take any two of the above languages (from B Group) except Kannada.

2. Students coming from outside the State and joining VIII, IX or X Standard and who have not studied any of the languages listed as First Language may be allowed to take Additional English or Hindi as First Language.

3. The teaching of Kannada from III Standard in Non-Kannada Schools will commence from the academic year 1982-83 itself and the language pattern for the High Schools prescribed in para 1 above will come into effect from the academic year 1987-88.

4. Students joining VIII Standard from the academic year 1982-83 cannot take Sanskrit as First Language or as composite First Language. They can take Sanskrit as Third Language. This system will continue till the language pattern prescribed in para 1 above comes into force from the academic year 1987-88.

5. The Commissioner for Public Instruction was requested to take necessary action in the matter immediately to implement the above orders."

5. Since it was felt that the order dated 30th April, 1982 did not sufficiently reflect the aspirations of the Kannada speaking people, the Government thought it expedient to place the entire matter before the State Legislature. The State Legislature resolved that in the High Schools Kannada must be the sole First regional language carrying 125 marks. In addition, a student might study any two languages carrying 100 marks each. 15 grace marks might be given for a period of 10 years belonging to linguistic minority community who study Kannada as First regional language and also those who study Hindi and whose mother tongue is not Hindi to enable the students whose mother tongue is not Kannada to learn Kannada a













































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top