SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 869

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.N. VENKATACHALIAH, C.J.I. AND S. MOHAN, J.
Aman Hingorani, Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. (C) No. 448 of 1994
Decided on 8-9-1994.
Advocates appeared
Petitioner-in-Person; Mr. N. N. Goswami, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Indra Swahney and Mr.V. K. Verma, Advocates with him, for Respondents.

Advocates:
Indra Sawhney, N.N.GOSWAMY, V.K.VARMA

Headnote:

U.P. Universities Act, 1973 - Section 28(5) - Dentists Act, 1948 - Section 10(A) - Candidates Seeking Transfer - Transfer Was Not Ordered - Respondents are students of B.D.S. Course pursuing their study outside State of U.P - Praveen Kumar Sharma is a student of Budha Institute of Dental Science and Hospital - College is recognised by Dental Council of India - Other respondents are students of Budha Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Patna which is also a recognised college - Vijay Pandey is a student of Ramarrao Adik Educational Societies, Dental Narul - Sharat Chandra Pandey is a student of College of Dental Surgery, Manipal. Sharat Chandra Pandey applied for transfer from Dental College, Manipal to Dental Faculty of King George Medical College, Lucknow, in third year course of B.D.S. - That transfer was not ordered - As a result, Sharad Chandra Pandey continued his study at Manipal, completed his third year and went to fourth year of study – Held, Any Regulation made in this regard could have effect more so in absence of any Regulation made by Dental Council - State Government has power under Section 28(5) of Act to regulate admission in medical institutions by issue of orders - Judgment directed consideration of applications for transfer in not only cases of writ petitioners before Court but also other pending applications - Undoubtedly, this was not a judgment in rem - Writ petitions were not filed in any representative capacity - There were also orders by High Court directing consideration of applications for transfer in light of statutory provisions - Imposes a complete embargo that no institution could increase its capacity in any course of study and training except with previous permission of Central Government - Representation of candidates seeking transfer - A direction be issued that cases of respondents for transfer shall be considered in light of Notification - Civil Appeal is ordered in above terms - However, there shall be no order as to costs – Appeal Disposed Of.

JUDGMENT

ORDER :- These proceedings relate to the state of affairs in the Agra Manasik Arogyashala. A similar situation arose in the matter of administration of the Ranchi Manasik Arogyashala. In Writ Petition (C) No. 339 of 1986 (Rakesh Chandra Narayan v. The State of Bihar) this Court had directed Sri M.S. Dayal, Union Health Secretary, to examine the matter and to submit a report as to the desirable appropriate administrative set-up for the administration of the Ranchi Manasik Arogyashala. Sri M.S. Dayal had submitted a report in that behalf. This Court, after exa-mining the report, had accepted its terms and directed a set-up for the administration of the Ranchi Manasik Arogyashala as an autonomous body as contemplated by the Dayal Report.

2. In respect of Agra Manasik Arogyashala we direct that a similar autonomous body of Management shall be constituted by the State Government on the lines indicated below:-

"Agra Mental Asylum shall be an autonomous institution and its management shall be vested in a Management Committee consisting of the following members :

(i) Divisional Commissioner, Agra - Chairman

(ii) District Magistrate, Agra - Member

(iii) Senior Superintendent of Police, Agra - Member

(iv) Health Secretary, Govt. of U.P. or his representative - Member

(v) Two non-officials, at least one of them shall be a woman nominated by the Government of U.P. - Members

(vi) Principal, King George Medical College, Lucknow - Member

(vii) Director of AMA - Member-Secretary.

Such a Committee should be constituted by the State Government on or before 1-10-1994.

The rules appended as Annexure-I hereto which is on the lines of Annexure-I to the Dayal Report, dated 11-7-1994 in respect of Ranchi Manasik Arogyashala shall govern the functioning of the Agra manasik Arogyashala. The State of Uttar Pradesh shall promulgate these Rules in terms of Annexure-I to this order on or before the 30th September, 1994. Till the Rules are so promulgated and brought into force, draft Rules at Annexure-I shall be operative as part of this order.

3. The Secretary, Health Department, State of U.P. shall be the ex-officio Director of Agra Manasik Arogyashala until the appointment of a regular Director. Such appointment shall take place on or before 30-11-1994, The appointment of the Director shall be made in consultation with and with the advice of Sri M.S. Dayal, Union Health Secretary.

4. We request the Union Health Secretary to be the advisor and visitor of the Agra Manasik Arogyashala under the new dispensation for a period of one year and submit his report as to its functioning and the requisite changes that may be necessary from time to time.

5. A copy of the order be sent to the Central Government, the Union Health Secretary, and Secretary, Health Department, State of Uttar Pradesh and other concerned Members-designate of the new Managing Committee. Ordered accordingly.

Agra Manasik Arogyashala Rules

1. These rules shall be called the Agra Manasik Arogyashala Rules, 1994.

Objectives :

2. The objectives of the Agra Manasik Arogyashala (hereinafter referred to as AMA) are :

(a) Diagnostic and therapeutic facilities for mental patients;

(b) Social and occupational rehabilitation of mental patients;

(c) Professional and para-professional training in the field of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatric Social Work and Psychiatric Nursing;

(d) Expansion of mental health services at community level by providing training to medical and para-medical personnel in the field; and

(e) Research in behavioural sciences.

Definitions :

3. In the rules :

(a) "Committee" means the Management Committee constituted under Rule 4.

(b) "Director" means the Director appointed under rule 5.

(c) "Gazette" means the U.P. Government Gazette.

Management Committee :

4.(1) AMA shall be an autonomous institution and its management shall be vested in a Management Committee consisting of the following members :

(i) Divisional Commissioner, Agra - Chairman

(ii) District Magistrate, Agra - Me


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top