SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. Pathak, CJI., K.N.Singh, Ranganath Misra, JJ.
State Of Bihar
Versus
Usha Martin Industries Limited
Case No. : 4534 of 1986
Date of Decision : 2/25/87
(1) THE question raised in this appeal stands concluded by the law laid down by this court in Pournami Oil Mills v. State of Kerala where the ratio laid down in M/s Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P. was affirmed. This is not disputed by learned counsel for the appellant. In the circumstances the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs.
followed : Pournami Oil Mills v. State of Kerala
Mis Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U. P
affirmed : Usha Martin Industries Ltd. v. Additional Supdt. of Commercial Taxes
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.